Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:34 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: > >> Hi Jordan, >> >> Thanks for bring it up. I know we had both side of argument on those >> changes. >> >> IMO in general, its

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Hi Jordan, > > Thanks for bring it up. I know we had both side of argument on those > changes. > > IMO in general, its all QA team responsibility to verify the requirement > very strictly and make sure no changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

Hi Jordan, Thanks for bring it up. I know we had both side of argument on those changes. IMO in general, its all QA team responsibility to verify the requirement very strictly and make sure no changes break existing released version and so users. Many times QA team does not agree to development

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

Hi gmann, Thanks for your candidacy. Let me ask one question if it's not too late. What's the role of the QA team when it comes to API change ? I have in mind the recent Glance change related to private vs shared image status. Someone in our community asked : * "I need to get an official decision

[openstack-dev] [QA] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the Pike cycle

Hi All, First and foremost would like to wish you all a successful 2017 ahead and with this I'm announcing my PTL candidacy of the Quality Assurance team for the Pike release cycle. I am glad to work in OpenStack community and would like to thank all the contributors who supported me to