Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
Robert Collins wrote: On 22 April 2014 20:45, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? As the lead for the TripleO topic, you should be able to review them (you should have a Review topic button near the top of the page). Let me know if that's not the case. OH, *I* can, but I wanted to know how thats delegated, and if there were any default delegations (e.g. -core reviewers). It's just that the odsreg app currently only accepts one lead username per topic, so by default I pick the PTL. It should just be changed to accept more than one (or overhauled to use permissions/roles for that instead). Will do one day, unless someone beats me to it (the code lives at openstack-infra/odsreg, if you are interested and can survive reading that hackish pile of code). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
I've collated the votes and put a proposed selection of talks (some sessions merged) up; I'm going to push a draft timetable as soon as I finish clicking on the clicky thing .:). If your session has been selected you now need to: - ensure there is an etherpad for it - link it into the global list of etherpads - make any feedback changes reviewers may have requested. Cheers, Ro b On 22 April 2014 12:01, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during the summit. I think we need to ensure reasonable coverage for: - CI - Finishing HA - Upgrades - Tuskar which arguably leaves just 2 slots for $whatever It seems to me we should focus on things where either: - we need to build basic consensus - crowdsourcing is at play I say that because we have many things being tackled and face time in the summit is precious - things that are straight engineering are not a particularly effective use of the time of a room with 30-80 people in it. -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
On 22 April 2014 20:45, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Robert Collins wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? As the lead for the TripleO topic, you should be able to review them (you should have a Review topic button near the top of the page). Let me know if that's not the case. OH, *I* can, but I wanted to know how thats delegated, and if there were any default delegations (e.g. -core reviewers). -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
On 04/28/2014 01:04 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I've collated the votes and put a proposed selection of talks (some sessions merged) up; I'm going to push a draft timetable as soon as I finish clicking on the clicky thing .:). If your session has been selected you now need to: - ensure there is an etherpad for it - link it into the global list of etherpads Okay, etherpad newbie here. Where is the global list of etherpads? Or do you mean the summit talks etherpad linked below? Thanks. -Ben - make any feedback changes reviewers may have requested. Cheers, Ro b On 22 April 2014 12:01, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during the summit. I think we need to ensure reasonable coverage for: - CI - Finishing HA - Upgrades - Tuskar which arguably leaves just 2 slots for $whatever It seems to me we should focus on things where either: - we need to build basic consensus - crowdsourcing is at play I say that because we have many things being tackled and face time in the summit is precious - things that are straight engineering are not a particularly effective use of the time of a room with 30-80 people in it. -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 04/28/2014 01:04 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I've collated the votes and put a proposed selection of talks (some sessions merged) up; I'm going to push a draft timetable as soon as I finish clicking on the clicky thing .:). If your session has been selected you now need to: - ensure there is an etherpad for it - link it into the global list of etherpads Okay, etherpad newbie here. Where is the global list of etherpads? Or do Create an etherpad and link to it from here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno/Etherpads -- -- James Slagle -- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
On 22/04/14 01:01, Robert Collins wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during the summit. I've allocated myself 6 votes and distributed them to the proposed sessions (on the etherpad), might be a good idea for others to do the same and give you an idea of where the interest lies. I think we need to ensure reasonable coverage for: - CI - Finishing HA - Upgrades - Tuskar which arguably leaves just 2 slots for $whatever It seems to me we should focus on things where either: - we need to build basic consensus - crowdsourcing is at play I say that because we have many things being tackled and face time in the summit is precious - things that are straight engineering are not a particularly effective use of the time of a room with 30-80 people in it. -Rob ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
Robert Collins wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? As the lead for the TripleO topic, you should be able to review them (you should have a Review topic button near the top of the page). Let me know if that's not the case. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta
I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during the summit. I think we need to ensure reasonable coverage for: - CI - Finishing HA - Upgrades - Tuskar which arguably leaves just 2 slots for $whatever It seems to me we should focus on things where either: - we need to build basic consensus - crowdsourcing is at play I say that because we have many things being tackled and face time in the summit is precious - things that are straight engineering are not a particularly effective use of the time of a room with 30-80 people in it. -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
