Le 2016-10-18 17:30, Shake Chen a écrit :
Thanks for your reply. Hope the Cloudkitty core review team can more
active
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cloudkitty+status:open
[7]
First of all you are more than welcome to come and participate ;)
Meanwhile you can be sure tha
Thanks for your reply. Hope the Cloudkitty core review team can more active
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cloudkitty+status:open
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Christophe Sauthier <
christophe.sauth...@objectif-libre.com> wrote:
> Ho Shake,
>
> Thanks for your feedback
Ho Shake,
Thanks for your feedback !!!
It is true (that all core so far are from the same company). On the
other hand there are only 3 cores...
The thing is in the past we haven't been unable to get a contributor on
a "long period of time" outside the company... Which is the reason why
so f
Hi
All the Cores member are same company, seem not good idea.
only 5 revew, 1 commit.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Guillaume Espanel <
guillaume.espa...@objectif-libre.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Guillaume Espanel
> Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com
> Infrastructure et Formations Linux
>
+1
--
Guillaume Espanel
Objectif Libre www.objectif-libre.com
Infrastructure et Formations Linux
Le 2016-10-18 13:16, Christophe Sauthier a écrit :
Hello developer mailing list folks,
I'd like to propose that we add Pierre-Aexandre Bardina (pabardina)
as an OpenStack cloudkitty
core reviewer.
Hello developer mailing list folks,
I'd like to propose that we add Pierre-Aexandre Bardina (pabardina) as
an OpenStack cloudkitty
core reviewer.
He has been a member of our community for a long time, contributing
very seriously in cloudkitty especially on the integration of cloudkitty
in Ho
