Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Ton, I belive so, I will create separate patch from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251158/ Also we need to explore possibility to create volume at /dev/vda2 device (it has about 5G free space). Unfortunately Atomic has very little documentation, so the plan is use Cinder volume until we can figure out better way. — Egor On Jan 18, 2016, at 22:27, Ton Ngo <t...@us.ibm.com<mailto:t...@us.ibm.com>> wrote: Hi Egor, Do we need to add a cinder volume to the master nodes for Kubernetes as well? We did not run Docker on the master node before so the volume was not needed. Ton Ngo, Hongbin Lu ---01/18/2016 12:29:09 PM---Hi Egor, Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We can definitely e From: Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> To: Egor Guz <e...@walmartlabs.com<mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com>>, OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: 01/18/2016 12:29 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hi Egor, Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We can definitely enable the swarm tests if everything works fine. Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com] Sent: January-18-16 2:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I did some digging and found that docker storage driver wasn’t configured correctly at agent nodes. Also it looks like Atomic folks recommend use deicated volumes for DeviceMapper (http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/). So added Cinder volume for the master as well (I tried create volumes at local storage, but it’s not even enough space for 1G volume). Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996, did around ~12 gates run and got only 2 failures (tests cannot connect to master, but all containers logs looks alrignt. e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312), we have similar error rates with Kub. So after merging this code we can try to enable voting for Swarm tests, thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:01, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: There are other symptoms as well, which I have no idea without a deep dip. -Original Message- From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com] Sent: January-08-16 2:14 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Clark, That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check. An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly. Best regards, Honbgin -Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate On Thu
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hongbin, I did some digging and found that docker storage driver wasn’t configured correctly at agent nodes. Also it looks like Atomic folks recommend use deicated volumes for DeviceMapper (http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/). So added Cinder volume for the master as well (I tried create volumes at local storage, but it’s not even enough space for 1G volume). Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996, did around ~12 gates run and got only 2 failures (tests cannot connect to master, but all containers logs looks alrignt. e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312), we have similar error rates with Kub. So after merging this code we can try to enable voting for Swarm tests, thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:01, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: There are other symptoms as well, which I have no idea without a deep dip. -Original Message- From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com] Sent: January-08-16 2:14 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Clark, That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check. An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly. Best regards, Honbgin -Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: Hi folks, It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. Please find the details in the review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have any concern. Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. Clark __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?s
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hi Egor,
Do we need to add a cinder volume to the master nodes for Kubernetes as
well? We did not run Docker on the master node before so the volume was
not needed.
Ton Ngo,
From: Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com>
To: Egor Guz <e...@walmartlabs.com>, OpenStack Development Mailing
List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: 01/18/2016 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test
from gate
Hi Egor,
Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We
can definitely enable the swarm tests if everything works fine.
Best regards,
Hongbin
-Original Message-
From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com]
Sent: January-18-16 2:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Cc: Hongbin Lu
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test
from gate
Hongbin,
I did some digging and found that docker storage driver wasn’t configured
correctly at agent nodes.
Also it looks like Atomic folks recommend use deicated volumes for
DeviceMapper (
http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/
).
So added Cinder volume for the master as well (I tried create volumes at
local storage, but it’s not even enough space for 1G volume).
Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996, did around
~12 gates run and got only 2 failures (tests cannot connect to master, but
all containers logs looks alrignt. e.g.
http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312
), we have similar error rates with Kub. So after merging this code we can
try to enable voting for Swarm tests, thoughts?
—
Egor
On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:01, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<
mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote:
There are other symptoms as well, which I have no idea without a deep dip.
-Original Message-
From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com]
Sent: January-08-16 2:14 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Cc: Hongbin Lu
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test
from gate
Hongbin,
I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should
comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning.
Thoughts?
—
Egor
On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<
mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/
Best regards,
Hongbin
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com]
Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test
from gate
Hongbin,
I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are
there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that
approach.
Adrian
On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<
mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Clark,
That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate
pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass
the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of
the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock
the patches that already passed the check.
An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well
or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will
adjust the review accordingly.
Best regards,
Honbgin
-Original Message-
From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org]
Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test
from gate
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote:
Hi folks,
It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively
impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins
gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable.
Please find the details in the review
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have any
concern.
Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much
because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from
Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass.
Clark
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<
mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org><
mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opensta
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hi Egor, Thanks for investigating on the issue. I will review the patch. Agreed. We can definitely enable the swarm tests if everything works fine. Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com] Sent: January-18-16 2:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I did some digging and found that docker storage driver wasn’t configured correctly at agent nodes. Also it looks like Atomic folks recommend use deicated volumes for DeviceMapper (http://www.projectatomic.io/blog/2015/06/notes-on-fedora-centos-and-docker-storage-drivers/). So added Cinder volume for the master as well (I tried create volumes at local storage, but it’s not even enough space for 1G volume). Please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267996, did around ~12 gates run and got only 2 failures (tests cannot connect to master, but all containers logs looks alrignt. e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/96/267996/3/check/gate-functional-dsvm-magnum-swarm/d8d855b/console.html#_2016-01-18_04_31_17_312), we have similar error rates with Kub. So after merging this code we can try to enable voting for Swarm tests, thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:01, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: There are other symptoms as well, which I have no idea without a deep dip. -Original Message- From: Egor Guz [mailto:e...@walmartlabs.com] Sent: January-08-16 2:14 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Cc: Hongbin Lu Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com><mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Clark, That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check. An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly. Best regards, Honbgin -Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: Hi folks, It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. Please find the details in the review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have any concern. Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. Clark __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org><mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (no
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com<mailto:hongbin...@huawei.com>> wrote: Clark, That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check. An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly. Best regards, Honbgin -Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: Hi folks, It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. Please find the details in the review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have any concern. Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. Clark __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:adrian.o...@rackspace.com] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian > On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Clark, > > That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate > pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass > the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the > test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the > patches that already passed the check. > > An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or > mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust > the review accordingly. > > Best regards, > Honbgin > > -Original Message- > From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] > Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func > test from gate > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively >> impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from >> Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. >> Please find the details in the review >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you >> have any concern. >> > Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much > because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from > Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. > > Clark > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Clark, That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the patches that already passed the check. An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust the review accordingly. Best regards, Honbgin -Original Message- From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi folks, > > It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively > impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from > Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. > Please find the details in the review > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have > any concern. > Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. Clark __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi folks, > > It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively > impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from > Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. > Please find the details in the review > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have > any concern. > Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. Clark __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hi folks, It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. Please find the details in the review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have any concern. Best regards, Hongbin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate
Hongbin, I’m not aware of any viable options besides using a nonvoting gate job. Are there other alternatives to consider? If not, let’s proceed with that approach. Adrian > On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Clark, > > That is true. The check pipeline must pass in order to enter the gate > pipeline. Here is the problem we are facing. A patch that was able to pass > the check pipeline is blocked in gate pipeline, due to the instability of the > test. The removal of unstable test from gate pipeline aims to unblock the > patches that already passed the check. > > An alternative is to remove the unstable test from check pipeline as well or > mark it as non-voting test. If that is what the team prefers, I will adjust > the review accordingly. > > Best regards, > Honbgin > > -Original Message- > From: Clark Boylan [mailto:cboy...@sapwetik.org] > Sent: January-07-16 6:04 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from > gate > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 02:59 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> It looks the swarm func test is currently unstable, which negatively >> impacts the patch submission workflow. I proposed to remove it from >> Jenkins gate (but keep it in Jenkins check), until it becomes stable. >> Please find the details in the review >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/) and let me know if you have >> any concern. >> > Removing it from gate but not from check doesn't necessarily help much > because you can only enter the gate pipeline once the change has a +1 from > Jenkins. Jenkins applies the +1 after check tests pass. > > Clark > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
