On 01/28/2015 07:24 PM, Adam Lawson wrote:
I'm short on time so I apologize for my candor since I need to get straight
to the point.
I love reading the various opinions and my team is immensely excited with
OpenStack is maturing. But this is lunacy.
I looked at the patch being worked [1]
Hi Anne; this was more or less directed in Monty's direction and/or those
in agreement with his position. Sorry for the confusion, I probably should
have been a bit more clear. ; )
Mahalo,
Adam
*Adam Lawson*
AQORN, Inc.
427 North Tatnall Street
Ste. 58461
Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230
On 01/29/2015 11:56 AM, Adam Lawson wrote:
Hi Anne; this was more or less directed in Monty's direction and/or those
in agreement with his position. Sorry for the confusion, I probably should
have been a bit more clear. ; )
Mahalo,
Adam
Okay, thanks Adam.
My name is Anita.
Thanks,
Anita.
Quick top-post apology...
It's entirely possible that there are people who are reading these lists
who do not personally know me or my tendency to overuse hyperbole.
I would like to formally apologize for both the subject of this thread
and my use of the word autocratic. They are both
Monty Taylor wrote:
You'll notice that I did say in my suggestion that ANYONE should be able
to propose a name - I believe that would include non-dev people. Since
the people in question are marketing people, I would imagine that if any
of them feel strongly about a name, that it should be
On 2015-01-28 23:37:18 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote:
If logistics are getting complicated, is it necessary to lock it
down so much? I vaguely recall a launchpad poll in the past, which
was effectively open to the public? Is voting on the shortlisted
names something we should just open wide
James E. Blair wrote:
Considering that the process used to be
a poll of the ~openstack group on launchpad, it seemed like a fairly
straightforward mapping to ATCs. I wanted to find the easiest way to
get the most people in the community likely to vote as possible without
needing to generate
Monty Taylor wrote:
What if, to reduce stress on you, we make this 100% mechanical:
- Anyone can propose a name
- Election officials verify that the name matches the criteria
- * note: how do we approve additive exceptions without tons of effort
Devil is in the details, as reading some of
Thierry Carrez wrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Considering that the process used to be
a poll of the ~openstack group on launchpad, it seemed like a fairly
straightforward mapping to ATCs. I wanted to find the easiest way to
get the most people in the community likely to vote as possible
Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org writes:
Monty Taylor wrote:
You'll notice that I did say in my suggestion that ANYONE should be able
to propose a name - I believe that would include non-dev people. Since
the people in question are marketing people, I would imagine that if any
of them
On 2015-01-28 10:29:38 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
The proposal as it stands (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150604/4)
currently excludes all non-ATCs from voting, though. The wider
community was included in previous iterations of the naming process,
so this very much feels like a
I'm short on time so I apologize for my candor since I need to get straight
to the point.
I love reading the various opinions and my team is immensely excited with
OpenStack is maturing. But this is lunacy.
I looked at the patch being worked [1] to change how things are done and
have more
On 01/28/2015 01:29 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
You'll notice that I did say in my suggestion that ANYONE should be able
to propose a name - I believe that would include non-dev people. Since
the people in question are marketing people, I would imagine that if any
of them
On 01/28/2015 11:36 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
What if, to reduce stress on you, we make this 100% mechanical:
- Anyone can propose a name
- Election officials verify that the name matches the criteria
- * note: how do we approve additive exceptions without tons of effort
-Original Message-
From: Tom Fifield [mailto:t...@openstack.org]
Sent: 28 January 2015 16:37
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Take back the naming process
On 28/01/15 23:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-01-28 10:29:38 +0100 (+0100), Thierry
I just want to toss in a quick 2 cents on the topic. It is important for
everyone to feel involved in the naming of our releases. It is part of who we
are. No one (including marketing) should be excluded from the discussion. I see
a lot of good feedback here and it should be fun again! Making
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community selected name should be.
I propose:
* As soon as development starts on release X, we open the voting for the
name of
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community selected name should be.
++
I propose:
++ absolutely!
Sent via mobile
On Jan 27, 2015, at 14:19, Jim Meyer j...@geekdaily.org wrote:
+1 all the way down.
More fun double-plus-good.
—j
On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right
On Jan 27, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community selected name should be.
Autocratic? Could
On 01/27/2015 06:05 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
On Jan 27, 2015, at 3:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community
On 01/27/2015 05:19 PM, Jim Meyer wrote:
+1 all the way down.
More fun double-plus-good.
—j
On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun -
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com writes:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a community selected name should be.
I propose:
* As soon as development starts on
+1 all the way down.
More fun double-plus-good.
—j
On Jan 27, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I do not like how we are selecting names for our releases right now.
The current process is autocratic and opaque and not fun - which is the
exact opposite of what a
24 matches
Mail list logo
