On 07/10/15 10:17 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-07 16:50:16 +0900:
On 06/10/15 23:36 +0900, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
>abandon policies for patches that haven't been
On 06/10/15 12:11 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
Overall I think this is a good idea and the time frame proposal also looks
good. Few suggestions in-line.
On 10/6/15 10:36 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
abandon
On 06/10/15 17:54 +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
Le 06/10/2015 16:36, Flavio Percoco a écrit :
Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
(...)
1) Lets do this on patches that haven't had any
On 06/10/15 23:36 +0900, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Greetings,
Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
I'd like to go forward and start following that policy with some
changes that you can find below:
On 06/10/15 17:52 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I send patches to Glance from time to time, and they usually got 0
review for *weeks* (sometimes months, because, well there are no
reviewers active in Glance, so:
1) Lets do this on patches that haven't
On 06/10/15 13:53 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-06 23:36:53 +0900:
Greetings,
Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
I'd like to go forward and
On 07/10/15 11:12 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around patches
that really matter.
I think that's where you are making a mistake.
On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
> patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around patches
> that really matter.
I think that's where you are making a mistake. They are contributors,
like me or Victor,
> From: Julien Danjou [jul...@danjou.info]
> Sent: 07 October 2015 10:12
>
> On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
> > patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around patches
> > that really matter.
>
> I
On 07/10/15 12:47 +, Bunting, Niall wrote:
From: Julien Danjou [jul...@danjou.info]
Sent: 07 October 2015 10:12
On Wed, Oct 07 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> I'm not trying to solve the lack of reviews in Liberty by removing
> patches. What I'd like to do, though, is help to keep around
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-07 16:50:16 +0900:
> On 06/10/15 23:36 +0900, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> >Greetings,
> >
> >Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
> >abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
> >
> >I'd like to
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-06 23:36:53 +0900:
> Greetings,
>
> Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
> abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
>
> I'd like to go forward and start following that policy with some
>
On 10/6/15 1:53 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-10-06 23:36:53 +0900:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
>> abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
>>
>> I'd like to go
On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I send patches to Glance from time to time, and they usually got 0
review for *weeks* (sometimes months, because, well there are no
reviewers active in Glance, so:
> 1) Lets do this on patches that haven't had any activity in the last 2
> months. This
Hi,
Le 06/10/2015 16:36, Flavio Percoco a écrit :
Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in Glance.
(...)
1) Lets do this on patches that haven't had any activity in the last 2
months. This adds one more month
Overall I think this is a good idea and the time frame proposal also
looks good. Few suggestions in-line.
On 10/6/15 10:36 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Not so long ago, Erno started a thread[0] in this list to discuss the
> abandon policies for patches that haven't been updated in
This again becomes a part of the undefinied priority concept. It's hard
to come up with a list of priorities all at the beginning of the cycle
so, conflicting priority items may get missed every now and then. I hope
the dashboard will help however, this is more of a people problem than a
process
I think Glance reviewer brandwidth is pretty low and the feedback time
can be quite high. For specs, I had requested a section describing the
core reviewer who will be vouching for your spec to be added to the spec
itself. I think in general we have not seen anyone doing that strongly.
If a spec
18 matches
Mail list logo
