Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] Question on GBP installation

Hi Yuki, Thanks for your email. We are currently in the process of updating the packages, and will update this webpage once that happens. Thanks, ~Sumit. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Yuki Miyahara wrote: > Hi GBP Team, > > Now I'm trying to install OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] what does policy rule action redirect do

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:17 AM, yong sheng gong <18618199...@163.com> wrote: > hi, > > I have followed the steps at > https://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/blob/master/gbpservice/tests/contrib/devstack/exercises/gbp_servicechain.sh > > and I can see the firewall and lb are created

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] Service Chain work with LBaaS/FWaaS

Hi Yao, Responses inline. Thanks, ~Sumit. On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 12:32 AM, 姚威 wrote: > Hi all, > > I know that GBP can work with neutron(ml2) by resource_mapping, and > group/policy all work well. > Assume that I have installed and enabled LBaaS and FWaaS，can I use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] do we have any usage doc about service function chaining feature?

I find this URL very useful for Group Based Policy: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy Also GitHub usually has good description on how to install. Hope this is useful, have a nice weekend, anthony. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group Based Policy] [Policy] [GBP]

Hi, Thanks for your question, but we haven’t explored this option. We will be happy to discuss this and provide any help/pointers you may need. Please feel free to join our weekly IRC meeting and/or drop into the #openstack-gbp channel to discuss further. ~Sumit. On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:10 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [group-based-policy] Meeting today

Hi Igor, Yes, no meeting today. We discussed in last week’s IRC. Happy Thanksgiving! ;-) Best, ~Sumit. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor wrote: > Hi GBP team, > > > > Is the meeting today not going to happen due to US Thanksgiving? > > > > Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [group-based-policy] QoS support in GBP

Thanks Igor. This is certainly of interest, let’s discuss during the IRC meeting today. Just a friendly reminder - for those in those in the US time zones, we start an earlier today on account on the fall time changes. ~Sumit. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor <

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy]

Hi Ernesto, Let me answer the first question for you. You can use GBP without OpenDaylight. OpenDaylight has a separate Group-based Policy project, which might make you wonder if you need it to run OpenStack GBP. Don’t worry, you can deploy OpenStack GBP right away without OpenDaylight. Best

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy]

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor < igor.duarte.card...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi Ernesto, > > > > Let me answer the first question for you. > > > > You can use GBP without OpenDaylight. > > > > OpenDaylight has a separate Group-based Policy project, which might make > you wonder

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-Based-Policy] Fixing backward incompatible unnamed constraints removal

I believe that, on the stable branch at least, we need to fix the migrations so that upgrades are possible. This probably means fixing them the same way on the master branch first and backporting the fixes to stable/juno. All migrations that were present in the initial juno release need to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-Based-Policy] Fixing backward incompatible unnamed constraints removal

Thanks Ivar for tracking this and bringing it up for discussion. I am good with taking approach (1). On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ivar Lazzaro ivarlazz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Team, As per discussion in the latest GBP meeting [0] I'm hunting down all the backward incompatible changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-Based-Policy] Service Chain Instance ownership

Hi Ivar, Thanks for bringing this up and my apologies for the late response (although I noticed that you already provided a fix, so thankfully you were not blocked ;-)). As discussed during the GBP IRC meeting, my suggestion would also be to use the first option, and create the service chain

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-Based-Policy] Use cases for External Policy chains

Ivar, With the currently supported set of services I also agree, but as more services get supported in the future, or we hand out that choice to tenants' VMs, it starts to justify a generic model that does not restrict whether EPs should provide service chains. That said, I do not yet totally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-Based-Policy] How to deal with improvements

Hi Ivar, My personal preference is to see information related to a particular feature in one place. So in cases like the ones you describe, I would propose that we update the existing spec. Of course, there is the problem of updating the same spec across different releases (since we create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy][GBP] PTL Candidacy

Sumit's candidacy for GBP PTL is confirmed! Regards Malini -Original Message- From: Sumit Naiksatam [mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 12:04 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Bhandaru, Malini K Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

On 10/7/14 6:36 PM, Ivar Lazzaro wrote: I posted a patch that implements the Different DB Different Chain approach [0]. That does not mean that this approach is the chosen one! It's just to have a grasp of what the change looks like. The Same DB different chain solution is much simpler to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

It seems to me that deployment tools such as puppet scripts would also be simpler if the GBP service plugin used the neutron DB, as there would be no need to create a separate DB, set its permissions, put its URL into neutron's config file, etc.. All that would be needed at deployment time is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

I posted a patch that implements the Different DB Different Chain approach [0]. That does not mean that this approach is the chosen one! It's just to have a grasp of what the change looks like. The Same DB different chain solution is much simpler to implement (basically you just specify a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

I believe Group-based Policy (which this thread is about) will use the Neutron database configuration for its dependent database. If Neutron is configured for: connection = mysql://user:pass@locationX:3306/neutron then GBP would use: connection =

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be implemented with the normal syntax and semantics of an intra-database foreign-key constraint. cross

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be implemented with the normal syntax and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

On Oct 4, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be implemented with the normal syntax and semantics of an intra-database foreign-key constraint. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Ivar Lazzaro ivarlazz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] Group-Based Policy Understanding and Queries

Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 09/23/2014 04:33 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Group-Based Policy Understanding and Queries Thanks for your interest in GBP, responses inline. On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Sachi Gupta

Re: [openstack-dev] Group-Based Policy Understanding and Queries

Thanks for your interest in GBP, responses inline. On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Sachi Gupta sachi.gu...@tcs.com wrote: Hi All, Request you all to provide inputs on below understanding: Openstack: Group-based policy is a blueprint for Juno-3 release of Openstack. It will extend