Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-02 Thread Zane Bitter
On 01/12/14 18:34, Angus Salkeld wrote: I'd suggest a combination between A and B. We may not be as far apart as I thought. 1) Separate some of the autoscaling logic into libraries in Heat 2) Get the separated REST service in place and working (using the above heat library) 3) Add an environm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by >> many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup >> resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Zane Bitter
On 28/11/14 02:33, Qiming Teng wrote: Dear all, Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one and the Heat native one. As more requests coming in, the team has p

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-12-01 Thread Qiming Teng
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:33:10PM +, Jastrzebski, Michal wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Qiming Teng [mailto:teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 8:33 AM > > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-11-28 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Qiming Teng wrote: > Dear all, > > Auto-Scaling is an important feature supported by Heat and needed by > many users we talked to. There are two flavors of AutoScalingGroup > resources in Heat today: the AWS-based one and the Heat native one. As > more requests

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-11-28 Thread Randall Burt
Per our discussion in Paris, I'm partial to Option B. I think a separate API endpoint is a lower priority at this point compared to cleaning up and normalizing the autoscale code on the back-end. Once we've refactored the engine code and solidified the RPC interface, it would be trivial to add a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat

2014-11-28 Thread Jastrzebski, Michal
> -Original Message- > From: Qiming Teng [mailto:teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 8:33 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Rework auto-scaling support in Heat > > Dear all, > > Auto-Scaling is an important feature sup