Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Yes. 100% upstream. And although I’ve referred to it as “reseller” (following the previous Keystone BP), it’s a much more generic pattern. Long term, I think it turns into something like a supply chain framework for services. Geoff On Apr 28, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: Geoff, Would the generic parts of your “reseller” solution by contributed to the upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to get the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the use cases. The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api) The cinder quota proposal is also underway (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver) Tim From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com] Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.com mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Hi all, Our team in the Federal University of Campina Grande implemented the initial Hierarchical Multitenancy support and now we are implementing the Reseller use case in Keystone. Already answering Travis question, in the Reseller solution we are merging the domains and projects entities: domains are going to be a feature of projects - if a project has the domain feature enabled, it will behave exactly as domains currently behave (being a container of users). With domain being a project, they will be part of the same hierarchy, for more details you may read the spec: https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/reseller.rst And yes, we need to extend the Hierarchical Mutlitenancy concept to other projects and our team is already working in Horizon and in contact with Sajeesh (Nova). We are definitely interested in participating the proposed design session and discussions that could emerge from it. -- Rodrigo Duarte On 28-04-2015 10:59, Geoff Arnold wrote: Yes. 100% upstream. And although I’ve referred to it as “reseller” (following the previous Keystone BP), it’s a much more generic pattern. Long term, I think it turns into something like a supply chain framework for services. Geoff On Apr 28, 2015, at 3:51 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: Geoff, Would the generic parts of your “reseller” solution by contributed to the upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to get the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the use cases. The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api) The cinder quota proposal is also underway (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver) Tim *From:*Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com] *Sent:* 28 April 2015 08:11 *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.com mailto:travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Geoff, Would the generic parts of your reseller solution by contributed to the upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to get the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the use cases. The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api) The cinder quota proposal is also underway (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver) Tim From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com] Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it's hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete reseller federation system. I'm assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.commailto:travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.commailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.commailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.commailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribemailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Thanks, I’ll have to read! Do you have a quick summary on what role domains are intended to play in this? Has the following statement been decided? 1. Domains may be modified to exist as top-level projects, or they may still exist solely as containers for users with the project hierarchy remaining separate. From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.commailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 12:10 AM To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.commailto:travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.commailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.commailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.commailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Use cases: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy Blueprints: (Kilo): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller (Liberty): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api (Pending): https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles As for adoption, it’s hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon (UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together into a complete “reseller” federation system. I’m assuming that there will be other system-level compositions of the various pieces. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S travis.tr...@hp.com wrote: Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn’t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I’ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Geoff, Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned. As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what the desired path forward is with regard to domains? Thanks, Travis On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote: Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I¹ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn¹t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _ _ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance?
Good points. I’ll add some details. I’m sure the Reseller guys will have some comments. Geoff On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com wrote: Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions. -Nikhil From: Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and Glance? In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn’t able to find anything. Did I miss something obvious? I’ve added a paragraph to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make sure it doesn’t get overlooked. Cheers, Geoff __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
