Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-07-15 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 12:00:55AM +, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Lars had a repo he maintains. Magnum had a repo it maintained. We > wanted one source of truth. The deal was we would merge all the > things into heat-coe-templates, delete larsks/heat-kubernetes and > delete the magnum temp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-07-07 Thread Adrian Otto
st (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, June 29, 2015 at 7:24 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-07-04 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
ent Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, June 29, 2015 at 7:24 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-30 Thread Kai Qiang Wu
your heart. You are miracle! From: "Fox, Kevin M" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: 06/30/2015 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates Whats the timeframe? I was rea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-30 Thread Fox, Kevin M
: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Fox, Kevin M mailto:kevin@pnnl.gov>> wrote: Needing to fork templates to tweak things is a very common problem.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-29 Thread Madhuri
ngus > > >> >> Would it be reasonable to keep if conditionals worked? >> >> Thanks, >> Kevin >> >> From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] >> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:01 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-29 Thread Angus Salkeld
; > Would it be reasonable to keep if conditionals worked? > > Thanks, > Kevin > > From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:01 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > S

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-29 Thread Fox, Kevin M
it be reasonable to keep if conditionals worked? Thanks, Kevin From: Hongbin Lu [hongbin...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:01 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Continuing with heat-coe-templates

2015-06-29 Thread Hongbin Lu
Agree. The motivation of pulling templates out of Magnum tree is hoping these templates can be leveraged by a larger community and get more feedback. However, it is unlikely to be the case in practise, because different people has their own version of templates for addressing different use cases