Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-19 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi

· I will add HTTP_METHOD to the ‘type’ enum of L7Rule

· GT,LT,GE,LE – at this phase I prefer to keep string based 
‘compare_type’ and I prefer not to add those number based compare types

· FILE_NAME,FILE_TYPE – Those two are a result of the URL 
fragmentation. Example: http://myserver/something/images/mypic.png . FILE_NAME 
= mypic FILE_TYPE = png

thanks

Avishay

From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 9:26 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi folks,
please see a few comments inline.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Stephen Balukoff 
mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net>> wrote:
A couple quick suggestions (additions):


 Entity: L7Rule

o   Attribute: type

•  Possible values:

  *   HTTP_METHOD

o   Attribute: compare_type

•  Possible values:

  *   GT (greater than)
  *   LT (less than)
  *   GE (greater than or equal to)
  *   LE (less than or equal to)
Will we be doing syntax checking based on the L7Rule type being presented?  
(eg. if w'ere going to check that HEADER X has a value that is greater than Y, 
are we going to make sure that "Y" is an integer? Or if we're going to check 
that the PATH STARTS_WITH Z, are we going to make sure that Z is a 
non-zero-length string? )
I think we should do these checks on the plugin level (API level doesn't 
support such checks at the moment).

Thanks,
Stephen

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Avishay Balderman 
mailto:avish...@radware.com>> wrote:
Here are the suggested values for the attributes below:

• Entity: L7Rule

o   Attribute: type

•  Possible values:

• HOST_NAME

• PATH

• FILE_NAME

• FILE_TYPE
Can somebody please clarify what FILE_NAME and FILE_TYPE mean? Just can't find 
corresponding matching criterias in haproxy.

• HEADER

• COOKIE

o   Attribute: compare_type

•  Possible values:

• EQUAL

• CONTAINS

• REGEX

• STARTS_WITH

• ENDS_WITH

• Entity:L7VipPolicyAssociation

o   Attribute:action

•  Possible values:

• POOL (must have pool id)

• REDIRECT(must have a url to be used as redirect destination)

• REJECT


From: Oleg Bondarev 
[mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com<mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com>]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17 AM

To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi,

I would add another candidate for being a closed set: 
L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.)

Thanks,
Oleg

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman 
mailto:avish...@radware.com>> wrote:
(removing extra space from the subject – let email clients apply their filters)

From: Avishay Balderman
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi
There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed set 
(Enum).
I would like to hear your opinion.

Entity:  L7Rule
Field : type
Description:  this field holds the part of the request where we should look for 
a value
Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?)

Entity:  L7Rule
Field : compare_type
Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
Note: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.

In general In the L7rule one can express the following (Example):
“check if in the value of header named ‘Jack’  starts with X” – if this is true 
– this rule “returns” true


Thanks

Avishay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



--
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi folks,
please see a few comments inline.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Stephen Balukoff wrote:

> A couple quick suggestions (additions):
>
>  Entity: L7Rule
>
> o   Attribute: type
>
> §  Possible values:
>
>
>- HTTP_METHOD
>
> o   Attribute: compare_type
>
> §  Possible values:
>
>
>- GT (greater than)
>- LT (less than)
>- GE (greater than or equal to)
>- LE (less than or equal to)
>
> Will we be doing syntax checking based on the L7Rule type being presented?
>  (eg. if w'ere going to check that HEADER X has a value that is greater
> than Y, are we going to make sure that "Y" is an integer? Or if we're going
> to check that the PATH STARTS_WITH Z, are we going to make sure that Z is a
> non-zero-length string? )
>
I think we should do these checks on the plugin level (API level doesn't
support such checks at the moment).

>
>
Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Avishay Balderman 
> wrote:
>
>>  Here are the suggested values for the attributes below:
>>
>> · Entity: L7Rule
>>
>> o   Attribute: type
>>
>> §  Possible values:
>>
>> · HOST_NAME
>>
>> · PATH
>>
>> · FILE_NAME
>>
>> · FILE_TYPE
>>
> Can somebody please clarify what FILE_NAME and FILE_TYPE mean? Just can't
find corresponding matching criterias in haproxy.

>  · HEADER
>>
>> · COOKIE
>>
>> o   Attribute: compare_type
>>
>> §  Possible values:
>>
>> · EQUAL
>>
>> · CONTAINS
>>
>> · REGEX
>>
>> · STARTS_WITH
>>
>> · ENDS_WITH
>>
>> · Entity:L7VipPolicyAssociation
>>
>> o   Attribute:action
>>
>> §  Possible values:
>>
>> · POOL (must have pool id)
>>
>> · REDIRECT(must have a url to be used as redirect destination)
>>
>> · REJECT
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17 AM
>>
>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I would add another candidate for being a closed set:
>> L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Oleg
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman 
>> wrote:
>>
>> (removing extra space from the subject - let email clients apply their
>> filters)
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Avishay Balderman
>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM
>> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed
>> set (Enum).
>>
>> I would like to hear your opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Entity:  L7Rule
>>
>> Field : type
>>
>> Description:  this field holds the part of the request where we should
>> look for a value
>>
>> Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?)
>>
>>
>>
>> Entity:  L7Rule
>>
>> Field : compare_type
>>
>> Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
>>
>> Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
>>
>> *Note*: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.
>>
>>
>>
>> In general In the L7rule one can express the following (Example):
>>
>> "check if in the value of header named 'Jack'  starts with X" - if this
>> is true - this rule "returns" true
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Avishay
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Balukoff
> Blue Box Group, LLC
> (800)613-4305 x807
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Oh!  One thing I forgot to mention below:


On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Avishay Balderman wrote:

>
> Entity:  L7Rule
>
> Field : compare_type
>
> Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
>
> Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
>
> *Note*: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.
>
>
>
I seem to recall reading in the haproxy manual that regex matches are
generally a lot slower than other kinds of matches. So, if you can do a
'path_beg' match, for example, that's a better performing choice over a
'path_reg' match which would accomplish the same thing. Given you have
mentioned that 'STARTS_WITH' and 'ENDS_WITH' are listed as compare_types
we're enumerating, I guess this has already been taken into account?



Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Stephen Balukoff
A couple quick suggestions (additions):

 Entity: L7Rule

o   Attribute: type

§  Possible values:


   - HTTP_METHOD

o   Attribute: compare_type

§  Possible values:


   - GT (greater than)
   - LT (less than)
   - GE (greater than or equal to)
   - LE (less than or equal to)

Will we be doing syntax checking based on the L7Rule type being presented?
 (eg. if w'ere going to check that HEADER X has a value that is greater
than Y, are we going to make sure that "Y" is an integer? Or if we're going
to check that the PATH STARTS_WITH Z, are we going to make sure that Z is a
non-zero-length string? )

Thanks,
Stephen

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Avishay Balderman wrote:

>  Here are the suggested values for the attributes below:
>
> · Entity: L7Rule
>
> o   Attribute: type
>
> §  Possible values:
>
> · HOST_NAME
>
> · PATH
>
> · FILE_NAME
>
> · FILE_TYPE
>
> · HEADER
>
> · COOKIE
>
> o   Attribute: compare_type
>
> §  Possible values:
>
> · EQUAL
>
> · CONTAINS
>
> · REGEX
>
> · STARTS_WITH
>
> · ENDS_WITH
>
> · Entity:L7VipPolicyAssociation
>
> o   Attribute:action
>
> §  Possible values:
>
> · POOL (must have pool id)
>
> · REDIRECT(must have a url to be used as redirect destination)
>
> · REJECT
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17 AM
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I would add another candidate for being a closed set:
> L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.)
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Oleg
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman 
> wrote:
>
> (removing extra space from the subject – let email clients apply their
> filters)
>
>
>
> *From:* Avishay Balderman
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed
> set (Enum).
>
> I would like to hear your opinion.
>
>
>
> Entity:  L7Rule
>
> Field : type
>
> Description:  this field holds the part of the request where we should
> look for a value
>
> Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?)
>
>
>
> Entity:  L7Rule
>
> Field : compare_type
>
> Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
>
> Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
>
> *Note*: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.
>
>
>
> In general In the L7rule one can express the following (Example):
>
> “check if in the value of header named ‘Jack’  starts with X” – if this is
> true – this rule “returns” true
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Avishay
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Stephen Balukoff
Blue Box Group, LLC
(800)613-4305 x807
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-18 Thread Avishay Balderman
Here are the suggested values for the attributes below:

· Entity: L7Rule

o   Attribute: type

§  Possible values:

· HOST_NAME

· PATH

· FILE_NAME

· FILE_TYPE

· HEADER

· COOKIE

o   Attribute: compare_type

§  Possible values:

· EQUAL

· CONTAINS

· REGEX

· STARTS_WITH

· ENDS_WITH

· Entity:L7VipPolicyAssociation

o   Attribute:action

§  Possible values:

· POOL (must have pool id)

· REDIRECT(must have a url to be used as redirect destination)

· REJECT


From: Oleg Bondarev [mailto:obonda...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 9:17 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi,

I would add another candidate for being a closed set: 
L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.)

Thanks,
Oleg

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman 
mailto:avish...@radware.com>> wrote:
(removing extra space from the subject – let email clients apply their filters)

From: Avishay Balderman
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

Hi
There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed set 
(Enum).
I would like to hear your opinion.

Entity:  L7Rule
Field : type
Description:  this field holds the part of the request where we should look for 
a value
Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?)

Entity:  L7Rule
Field : compare_type
Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
Note: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.

In general In the L7rule one can express the following (Example):
“check if in the value of header named ‘Jack’  starts with X” – if this is true 
– this rule “returns” true


Thanks

Avishay

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types

2014-02-16 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi,

I would add another candidate for being a closed set:
L7VipPolicyAssociation.action (use_backend, block, etc.)

Thanks,
Oleg


On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Avishay Balderman wrote:

>  (removing extra space from the subject - let email clients apply their
> filters)
>
>
>
> *From:* Avishay Balderman
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:56 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 data types
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> There are 2 fields in the L7 model that are candidates for being a closed
> set (Enum).
>
> I would like to hear your opinion.
>
>
>
> Entity:  L7Rule
>
> Field : type
>
> Description:  this field holds the part of the request where we should
> look for a value
>
> Possible values: URL,HEADER,BODY,(?)
>
>
>
> Entity:  L7Rule
>
> Field : compare_type
>
> Description: The way we compare the value against a given value
>
> Possible values: REG_EXP, EQ, GT, LT,EQ_IGNORE_CASE,(?)
>
> *Note*: With REG_EXP we can cover the rest of the values.
>
>
>
> In general In the L7rule one can express the following (Example):
>
> "check if in the value of header named 'Jack'  starts with X" - if this is
> true - this rule "returns" true
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Avishay
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev