Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Mellquist, Peter
Looks good Eugene! What about 'status' on the loadbalancer instance? This might be the aggregate of all the VIP statuses. (worst of VIP[0-N] ) Peter. From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 5:15 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Mellquist, Peter
adbalancer container is a good data model change and will help to make the API easier to use. Peter. From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 1:20 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neut

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Samuel Bercovici
nstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Monty, On 18/11/13 15:17, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 11/18/2013 07:14 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> Hi, > >> On 15/11/13 13:14, Euge

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Andrew Hutchings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey Monty, On 18/11/13 15:17, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 11/18/2013 07:14 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote: >> Hi, > >> On 15/11/13 13:14, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: >>> I've created a brief description of this feature. You can find >>> it here: >>> https://wi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Monty Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2013 07:14 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/11/13 13:14, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: >> I've created a brief description of this feature. You can find it >> here: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstanc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Andrew Hutchings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 15/11/13 13:14, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > I've created a brief description of this feature. You can find it > here: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
I think we can discuss backward compatibility further. So the gist of the feature is that loadbalancer resource is introduced that should be created first and becomes the root object of the existing lbaas object graph. There could be 2 options of preserving API compatibility: 1) preserve it on Neu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Aaron Rosen
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Stephen Gran wrote: > On 15/11/13 13:14, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I've created a brief description of this feature. >> You can find it here: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-18 Thread Samuel Bercovici
backward compatibility issue as well. Thanks, -Sam. From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 6:52 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
> How do you plan to handle API compatibility? The new API is not compatible and i think there was a consensus that such change is needed and incompatibility is justified. > Is an extension for each (eg. add router_id to a loadblancer resource) necessary ? Basically, yes, there should be an extens

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-17 Thread Itsuro ODA
Hi, > 2. Loadbalancer can be used to bind configuration to a provider, device, > agent (host), router What's the plan about this ? Is an extension for each (eg. add router_id to a loadblancer resource) necessary ? Thanks. Itsuro Oda On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:14:47 +0400 Eugene Nikanorov wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-17 Thread IWAMOTO Toshihiro
At Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:14:47 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've created a brief description of this feature. > You can find it here: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance > > I w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Loadbalancer instance design.

2013-11-15 Thread Stephen Gran
On 15/11/13 13:14, Eugene Nikanorov wrote: Hi folks, I've created a brief description of this feature. You can find it here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance I would appreciate any comments