Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit scheduling - using our time together wisely.

2014-10-27 Thread Clint Byrum
I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think we should still bring it up) and also a bit about Cinder HA. I think these are

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit scheduling - using our time together wisely.

2014-10-27 Thread Ben Nemec
On 10/27/2014 12:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think we should still bring it up) and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit scheduling - using our time together wisely.

2014-10-21 Thread Giulio Fidente
On 10/20/2014 04:34 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve. There's a spec out for Cinder HA already

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit scheduling - using our time together wisely.

2014-10-20 Thread Ben Nemec
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve. There's a spec out for Cinder HA already (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101237/)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit scheduling - using our time together wisely.

2014-10-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Clint Byrum wrote: * The Ops Summit is Wendesday/Thursday [3], which overlaps with these sessions. I am keenly interested in gathering more contribution from those already operating and deploying OpenStack. It can go both ways, but I think it might make sense to have more ops-centric