Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-10-27 11:39:31 -0700:
> On 10/27/2014 12:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
> > start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
> > the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that n
On 10/27/2014 12:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
> start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
> the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think
> we should still bring it up) and
I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think
we should still bring it up) and also a bit about Cinder HA. I think
these are thin
On 10/20/2014 04:34 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are
contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there
is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve.
There's a spec out for Cinder HA already
(htt
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are
contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there
is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve.
There's a spec out for Cinder HA already
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101237/) that
Clint Byrum wrote:
> * The Ops Summit is Wendesday/Thursday [3], which overlaps with these
> sessions. I am keenly interested in gathering more contribution from
> those already operating and deploying OpenStack. It can go both ways,
> but I think it might make sense to have more ops-centric
