On 09/16/2014 08:55 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
pub/sub doesn't necessarily guarantees messages delivery, it really
depends on the implementation.
As I understand it, the model for pub-sub in Zaqar is to have multiple
subscribers polling the queue with gets, and have the messages removed
from
On 09/15/2014 09:33 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-09-15 12:05:09 -0700:
On 15/09/14 13:28, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-15 00:57:05 -0700:
On 09/12/2014 07:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's
On 09/12/2014 07:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2014-09-12 02:16:42 -0700:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-11 04:14:30 -0700:
Is Zaqar being optimized as a *queuing* service? I'd say no. Our goal is
to optimize Zaqar
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-15 00:57:05 -0700:
On 09/12/2014 07:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2014-09-12 02:16:42 -0700:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-11 04:14:30 -0700:
Is Zaqar being
On 15/09/14 13:28, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-15 00:57:05 -0700:
On 09/12/2014 07:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2014-09-12 02:16:42 -0700:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-11
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-09-15 12:05:09 -0700:
On 15/09/14 13:28, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-15 00:57:05 -0700:
On 09/12/2014 07:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2014-09-12 02:16:42 -0700:
Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-11 04:14:30 -0700:
Is Zaqar being optimized as a *queuing* service? I'd say no. Our goal is
to optimize Zaqar for delivering messages and supporting different
messaging patterns.
Awesome! Just please don't expect people to
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:51 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
Based on the feedback from the meeting[3], the current main concern is:
- Do we need a messaging service with a feature-set akin to SQS+SNS?
[...]
I think we do need, as Samuel puts it, some sort of
On 09/11/2014 07:46 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/10/2014 03:18 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Other OpenStack components can integrate with Zaqar to surface events
to end users and to communicate with guest agents that run in the
over-cloud layer.
2014-09-12 10:44 GMT-03:00 Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com:
On 09/11/2014 07:46 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/10/2014 03:18 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Other OpenStack components can integrate with Zaqar to surface
events
to end users and to
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of 2014-09-12 03:27:42 -0700:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:51 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
Based on the feedback from the meeting[3], the current main concern is:
- Do we need a messaging service with a feature-set
On 09/10/2014 03:18 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
To clarify the doubts of what Zaqar is or it's not, let me quote what's
written in the project's overview section[0]:
Zaqar is a multi-tenant cloud messaging service for web developers.
How are
On 09/10/2014 03:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 01:51 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I think we do need, as Samuel puts it, some sort of durable
message-broker/queue-server thing. It's a basic application building
block. Some claim it's THE basic application building block, more useful
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-11 04:14:30 -0700:
On 09/10/2014 03:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 09/10/2014 01:51 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I think we do need, as Samuel puts it, some sort of durable
message-broker/queue-server thing. It's a basic application building
On 09/09/2014 09:03 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 09/04/2014 01:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2014-09-04 00:08:47 -0700:
Greetings,
Last Tuesday the TC held the first graduation review for Zaqar. During
the meeting some concerns arose. I've listed those
Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
Based on the feedback from the meeting[3], the current main concern is:
- Do we need a messaging service with a feature-set akin to SQS+SNS?
[...]
I think we do need, as Samuel puts it, some sort of durable
message-broker/queue-server thing. It's a basic
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
To clarify the doubts of what Zaqar is or it's not, let me quote what's
written in the project's overview section[0]:
Zaqar is a multi-tenant cloud messaging service for web developers.
How are different tenants isolated from each other?
On 09/10/2014 01:51 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I think we do need, as Samuel puts it, some sort of durable
message-broker/queue-server thing. It's a basic application building
block. Some claim it's THE basic application building block, more useful
than database provisioning. It's definitely a
Excerpts from Gordon Sim's message of 2014-09-10 06:18:52 -0700:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
To clarify the doubts of what Zaqar is or it's not, let me quote what's
written in the project's overview section[0]:
Zaqar is a multi-tenant cloud messaging service for web
On 09/10/2014 07:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Gordon Sim's message of 2014-09-10 06:18:52 -0700:
On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
Other OpenStack components can integrate with Zaqar to surface events
to end users and to communicate with guest agents that run in the
20 matches
Mail list logo
