On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
The problem with the spec is that it doesn't know what to replace
WSME with.
Thanks to everyone who provided some input.
The summary is: A lot of support for Flask. A fair bit of support
for the idea of using JSONSchema and publishing it.
Since this isn
On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:10 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> It seems like Flask has a reasonable amount of support and there is a good
> ecosystem around it but that aside (as Jay said)... I definitely support
> exposing the schema to the end user; making it easier for the end user to
> validate inp
It seems like Flask has a reasonable amount of support and there is a good
ecosystem around it but that aside (as Jay said)... I definitely support
exposing the schema to the end user; making it easier for the end user to
validate input / model outputs for their integration with OpenStack
services
On 08/28/2015 10:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
So at the present moment the [micro]framework that comes to my mind -
without any testing or prototype of any sort - is Flask.
just wanted to add on here, sahara is using flask.
mike
__
On 2015-08-28 11:27:57 -0700 (-0700), Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Out of curiosity how are u using voluptuous (and/or getting it installed?),
> when I tried to propose that to the global requirements requirement
> list/repo I got shot-down (since json-schema does similar things);
Zuul uses voluptuous t
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it als
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
con
On 08/28/2015 08:32 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
con
On 08/28/2015 07:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
have specific comments on the spec please response there.
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would t
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Jay Pipes wrote:
> voluptuous may be more Pythonic, as Julien mentioned, but the problem is you
> can't expose the validation schema to the end user via any standard document
> format (like JSONSchema). Using the jsonschema library along with standard
> JSONSchema documents al
I enjoy using validictory for using Jsonschema with Python
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/validictory.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> On 08/28/2015 07:22 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
>>
>> This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
>> Ceilom
On 08/28/2015 07:22 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
Ceilometer with ... something:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
controller code that is inscrutable.
The prob
On Fri, Aug 28 2015, Chris Dent wrote:
> This morning I kicked off a quick spec for replacing WSME in
> Ceilometer with ... something:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218155/
>
> This is because not only is WSME not that great, it also results in
> controller code that is inscrutable.
>
>
On 08/28/2015 10:36 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
>> have specific comments on the spec please response there.
>>
>
> I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
> for options. IMHO after usin
On 08/28/2015 04:36 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
have specific comments on the spec please response there.
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would t
Hi,
> If you just want to shoot the breeze please respond here. If you
> have specific comments on the spec please response there.
>
I have been thinking about doing it for Ironic as well so I'm looking
for options. IMHO after using WSME I would think that one of the most
important criteria we sh
16 matches
Mail list logo