From: Ben Swartzlander [mailto:b...@swartzlander.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:11 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On 08/27/2015 10:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
Hi,
Looks like we need to be able to set AZ per backend. What do
Except your failure domain includes the cinder volume service, independent
of the resiliency of you backend, so if they're all on one node then you
don't really have availability zones.
I have historically strongly espoused the same view as Ben, though there
are lots of people who want fake
From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 2:31 PM
Except your failure domain includes the cinder volume service, independent
of the resiliency of you backend, so if they're all on one node then you don't
really have availability zones.
I have
our Ceph crush map, so Cinder doesn't need to worry about it.
It should just throw volumes at the configured RBD pool for the requested
backend and not concern itself with what's going on behind the scenes.
From: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova
Hi,
Looks like we need to be able to set AZ per backend. What do you think
about such option?
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:07 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com
wrote:
Hi,
In
On 08/27/2015 10:43 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
Hi,
Looks like we need to be able to set AZ per backend. What do you think
about such option?
I dislike such an option.
The whole premise behind an AZ is that it's a failure domain. The node
running the cinder services is in exactly one such
: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Cinder and Nova availability
zones
Hi,
Looks like we need to be able to set AZ per backend. What do you think
about such option?
Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:07 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
mailto:john.griffi
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com
wrote:
Hi,
In Kilo cycle [1] was merged. It started passing AZ of a booted VM to
Cinder to make volumes appear in the same AZ as VM. This is certainly a
good approach, but I wonder how to deal with an use case when
