Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Austin Design Summit space needs

[Flavio Percoco]

On 24/02/16 11:42 -0400, Flavio Percoco wrote:

Hey Folks,

It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards to
slots and sessions are for the next summit.

We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:

* Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.

* Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.

* Contributors meetup (Fri)
Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
during the week, whatever works for you.

Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2


Greetings,

Given the time constraints, the raising number of new projects, we're going to
stick to the same number of slots we had back in Tokyo.

Cheers,
Flavio

--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Austin Design Summit space needs

[Flavio Percoco]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Nikhil Komawar 
wrote:

> Here are a few ideas that I've in mind (more than 6 for now) for the
> workroom sessions (of course that can be prioritized):
>
> 1. Import refactor
> 2. Glare
> 3. Quotas
> 4. State of Image sharing, community images, Hierarchical Images etc.
> 5. glance_store improvements, general gate jobs discussions, releases
> discussions, logging, notification etc.
> 6. First hand & closed loop dedicated operator, superuser, general user,
> experience, etc. feedback
> 7. Feedback into the team from other projects, cross projects, general
> workflow, etc. changes
> 8. Priorities discussions
>

Thing is that most of what's going to be discussed is dictated by the
priorities themselves. We have a rough idea of what the priorities for
Newton are.

I think the list you provided is good but it still doesn't seem to require
an extra workroom for us (considering we have 3 fishbowl sessions too).

Flavio

>
> I think we can utilize the contributors meetup for some of them but all of
> them potentially involve folks who may not necessarily be first level
> contributors to Glance or at all (in case they want to attend other
> meetup). Also, asking for 8 (or more than 6) would be ill effect against
> being good openstack citizens.
>
>
> On 2/24/16 12:25 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar < 
> nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we make it ? :
>>
>> FB 3
>> W 6
>> C 2
>>
>>
>
> Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions?
>
> Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects
> to host in Austin.
>
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>
>
>>
>> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards
>> to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>>
>> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>>
>> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
>> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
>> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
>> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>>
>> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
>> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
>> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
>> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>>
>> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
>> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
>> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
>> during the week, whatever works for you.
>>
>> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>>
>> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts?
>> Cheers,
>> Flavio
>>
>> --
>> @flaper87
>> Flavio Percoco
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nikhil
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Austin Design Summit space needs

[Nikhil Komawar]

Here are a few ideas that I've in mind (more than 6 for now) for the
workroom sessions (of course that can be prioritized):

1. Import refactor
2. Glare
3. Quotas
4. State of Image sharing, community images, Hierarchical Images etc.
5. glance_store improvements, general gate jobs discussions, releases
discussions, logging, notification etc.
6. First hand & closed loop dedicated operator, superuser, general user,
experience, etc. feedback
7. Feedback into the team from other projects, cross projects, general
workflow, etc. changes
8. Priorities discussions

I think we can utilize the contributors meetup for some of them but all
of them potentially involve folks who may not necessarily be first level
contributors to Glance or at all (in case they want to attend other
meetup). Also, asking for 8 (or more than 6) would be ill effect against
being good openstack citizens.

On 2/24/16 12:25 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar
> > wrote:
>
> Can we make it ? :
>
> FB 3
> W 6
> C 2
>
>
>
> Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions?
>
> Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more
> projects to host in Austin.
>
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>  
>
>
> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with
>> regards to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>>
>> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>>
>> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
>> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
>> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased
>> external
>> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>>
>> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
>> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
>> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not
>> overcrowd
>> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>>
>> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
>> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
>> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
>> during the week, whatever works for you.
>>
>> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>>
>> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts? 
>> Cheers,
>> Flavio
>>
>> -- 
>> @flaper87
>> Flavio Percoco
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> -- 
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>

-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Austin Design Summit space needs

[Flavio Percoco]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar 
wrote:

> Can we make it ? :
>
> FB 3
> W 6
> C 2
>
>

Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions?

Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects to
host in Austin.

Cheers,
Flavio


>
> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
> Hey Folks,
>
> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards
> to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>
> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>
> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>
> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>
> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
> during the week, whatever works for you.
>
> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>
> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts?
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Austin Design Summit space needs

[Nikhil Komawar]

Can we make it ? :

FB 3
W 6
C 2

On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with
> regards to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>
> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>
> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>
> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>
> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
> during the week, whatever works for you.
>
> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>
> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts? 
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>
> -- 
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 

Thanks,
Nikhil

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev