Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-27 Thread 王宏
/2014 02:00 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. -- @flwang, np at all. We can put the input in bug report as a comment or here anyway, as far as it can let us/me know the gains/advantages on this fix

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-27 Thread Flavio Percoco
Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01/27/2014 02:00 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-27 Thread Flavio Percoco
List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01/27/2014 07:07 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. ━━━ I think it is OK that we keep

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Fei Long Wang
Hi Wang Hong, Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L244 For the case-matter issue, I think it's a bug. But as for the - to _, I would like to listen Jay's opinion since who is the original author. And

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Jay Pipes
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote: Hi Wang Hong, Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/common/utils.py#L244 For the case-matter issue, I think it's a bug. But as for the - to _, I would like

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Fei Long Wang
Wang/China/IBM@IBMCN, Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 01/26/2014 11:20 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
/2014 11:20 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 18:48 +0800, Fei Long Wang wrote: Hi Wang Hong, Good catch. I think the issue is caused by line 244-246, see https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Fei Long Wang
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 01/27/2014 01:02 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 01/27/2014 01:02 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter.

2014-01-26 Thread Fei Long Wang
: [openstack-dev] [glance]A question abount the x-image-meta-property parameter. One quick question, do you think there is a potential backward-capability breaking issue for end user or ISV if we remove existing standardizing/normalizing logic? I'd like to know the gains/advantages