On 03/12/2014 06:34 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a
nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect
this to work?
This sort of thing works fine for us. It needs some patches that missed
Havana, though.
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a nested
stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect this to work?
Hi Mike,
Yes I tested it and it works. I'm trying to build an example for heat-templates
putting it all together. I'm mostly struggling
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and
OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Kevin,
The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support
for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource
questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 03/13/2014 02:19 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron]
OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Chris,
That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and
testing that out. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas
Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the
configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code changes
as far as I
Hi Kevin,
The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit support
for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a resource that
wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a template and use it via
a Stack resource.
(Note that Mike was talking
