Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread James E. Blair
Sean Dague writes: > We're still working through kinks in the new system, which is why it's > not fully documented yet. We did not intend to change the general operation of 'recheck' and 'reverify', however, we did have some bugs in the early stages where we missed a possible state-change. I be

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Yeoh
l.com>>> > > >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > > >>questions)" > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > >><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Sean Dague
@gmail.com>>> > >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > >>questions)" <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
how can we ensure >> >>that a approved patch does a retry? >> >> Thanks >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> From: Sylvain Bauza > >><mailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com>> >> >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development M

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-18 Thread Christopher Yeoh
ved patch does a retry? > >> Thanks > >> Gary > >> > >> From: Sylvain Bauza >><mailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com>> > >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > >>questions)" >><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.o

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Gary Kotton
gt;> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage >>questions)" ><mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 2:53 PM >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >>&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Akihiro Motoki
; To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck > > Hi Gary, > > That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, se

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Sylvain Bauza
y 17, 2014 2:53 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck Hi Gary, That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, se

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Hayes, Graham
Was that not for 'reverify no bug' ? Graham On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 13:53 +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > Hi Gary, > > > That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, > see > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html > > > -Sylvain > > > 2014-02-

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Denis Makogon
As mentioned at those email - "reverify bug #" must work. " You may still use "reverify bug #" to re-enqueue if there is a bug report for a failure, and of course you are encouraged to file a bug report if there is not. Elastic-recheck is doing a great job of indicating which bugs might hav

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Gary Kotton
nStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 2:53 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Gary, That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html -Sylvain 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton : > Hi, > It seems that the command 'reverify bug ' is not working. Anyone > else experienced thi