Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 03:23:08PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> 
> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the
> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to work"
> days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is working.  Getting
> this restriction removed means we don't have to edit away the tests for
> Kerberos in python3.

We had a good discussion about this in #openstack-keystone [1].

The summary of this is we're going to hold off on this until after we branch
stable/newton and fix this up with the next release of keystoneauth[2]

Yours Tony.

[1] 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/latest.log.html#t2016-09-14T01:54:12
[2] 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-keystone/latest.log.html#t2016-09-14T02:38:45


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 16:07:46 -0500:
> On 09/13/2016 03:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 15:09:39 -0500:
> >> On 09/13/2016 02:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> 
>  This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
>  latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
>  work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
>  working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
>  away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
> 
>  "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
>  2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
>  since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
>  we can increase so just leave this unbound."
> >>>
> >>> Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
> >>> supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?
> >>>
> >>> Doug
> >>>
> >>> __
> >>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think / thought keystone was supported on python 3 (maybe not all
> >> features in mitaka though).  I'm currently running it on python 3
> >> (through uwsgi).
> > 
> > Is there a gate job to back that up?
> > 
> > Doug
> > 
> > __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> It looks like there's a python3.4 job running for this mitaka review at
> least.  https://review.openstack.org/369618
> 

Those are unit tests. Do we have the functional tests or integration
tests running under 3.4 or 3.5?

Doug

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/13/2016 03:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 15:09:39 -0500:
>> On 09/13/2016 02:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/

 This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
 latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
 work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
 working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
 away the tests for Kerberos in python3.

 "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
 since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
 we can increase so just leave this unbound."
>>>
>>> Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
>>> supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?
>>>
>>> Doug
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>> I think / thought keystone was supported on python 3 (maybe not all
>> features in mitaka though).  I'm currently running it on python 3
>> (through uwsgi).
> 
> Is there a gate job to back that up?
> 
> Doug
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
It looks like there's a python3.4 job running for this mitaka review at
least.  https://review.openstack.org/369618

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Matthew Thode's message of 2016-09-13 15:09:39 -0500:
> On 09/13/2016 02:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> >>
> >> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
> >> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
> >> work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
> >> working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
> >> away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
> >>
> >> "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
> >> 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
> >> since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
> >> we can increase so just leave this unbound."
> > 
> > Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
> > supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?
> > 
> > Doug
> > 
> > __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> 
> I think / thought keystone was supported on python 3 (maybe not all
> features in mitaka though).  I'm currently running it on python 3
> (through uwsgi).

Is there a gate job to back that up?

Doug

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/13/2016 02:23 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> 
> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the
> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to
> work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is
> working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit
> away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
> 
> "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python
> 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has
> since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency
> we can increase so just leave this unbound."
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
It looks like this has limited impact so I'm ok with this.  It (and the
keystonemiddleware ffe) are kinda late in the cycle though...

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Matthew Thode
On 09/13/2016 02:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
>>
>> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
>> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
>> work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
>> working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
>> away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
>>
>> "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
>> 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
>> since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
>> we can increase so just leave this unbound."
> 
> Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
> supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?
> 
> Doug
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

I think / thought keystone was supported on python 3 (maybe not all
features in mitaka though).  I'm currently running it on python 3
(through uwsgi).

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][release][requirements][FFE] global-requirements update for requests-kerberos

2016-09-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2016-09-13 15:23:08 -0400:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/368530/
> 
> This change is for Python >2.7 only, as python2.7 already supports the 
> latest version of these libraraies.  Back in the "just get pythoin3 to 
> work" days we cut our losses on Kerberos support, but now it is 
> working.  Getting this restriction removed means we don't have to edit 
> away the tests for Kerberos in python3.
> 
> "The requests-kerberos package was marked as available for only python 
> 2.6 and python 2.7 because pykerberos did not support python 3. This has 
> since been fixed, however we don't directly have a kerberos dependency 
> we can increase so just leave this unbound."

Do we need an FFE for this or can it wait for Ocata? AFAIK, we aren't
supporting deployment on Python 3, yet, right?

Doug

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev