On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com
wrote:
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs, one thing I've noticed is,
there is inconsistency in the 'REST API Impact' section.
To be clear here, I don't mean we shouldn't include what new APIs will be
created, I
@lists.openstack.org,
Date:
07/07/2014 01:39 PM
Subject:
Re: [openstack-dev]
[keystone][specs] listing the entire API in anew
spec
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com
wrote:
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs,
one thing I've noticed
questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date:07/07/2014 01:39 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][specs] listing the entire
API in anew spec
--
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli *steve...@ca.ibm.com*
steve
][specs] listing the entire
API in anew spec
--
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Steve Martinelli *steve...@ca.ibm.com*
steve...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
To add to the growing pains of keystone-specs, one thing I've noticed is,
there is inconsistency in the 'REST
