On February 15, 2015 at 3:54:24 PM, Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:24 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> So, let me just say that while I do not have a timeline on the removal
> of auth fragments, since it is deprecated assume that this should no
> longer be used if there is a
On 02/16/2015 12:24 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
> So, let me just say that while I do not have a timeline on the removal
> of auth fragments, since it is deprecated assume that this should no
> longer be used if there is an alternative (which there is). I am willing
> to continue with the discussion
On February 15, 2015 at 3:16:04 PM, Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org) wrote:
On 02/15/2015 02:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
>> identity_uri.
>>
>>
On 02/15/2015 02:56 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
>> identity_uri.
>>
>> I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
>> information in a
On February 14, 2015 at 5:59:13 PM, Clint Byrum (cl...@fewbar.com) wrote:
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
> identity_uri.
>
> I don't really like the identity_uri which conta
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-02-14 16:48:01 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen messages in the logs telling that we should move to the
> identity_uri.
>
> I don't really like the identity_uri which contains all of the
> information in a single directive, which means that a script that w
