hi,
just so this issue doesn't get lost again. Mehdi's bp seems like a good
place to track this issue:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/usage-data-in-notification.
Joe, i agree with you that it's too late for this iteration... maybe it's
something we should mark low priority for J
On 02/26/2014 03:33 PM, Gordon Chung wrote:
hi,
just so this issue doesn't get lost again. Mehdi's bp seems like a good
place to track this issue:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/usage-data-in-notification.
Joe, i agree with you that it's too late for this iteration... maybe
Ceilometer really needs to stop importing server projects in unit tests.
By nature this is just going to break all the time.
i believe that was the takeaway from the thread -- it's an old thread and
i was just doing some back-reading.
Cross project interactions need to be tested by
On Tue, Feb 04 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
Ceilometer running a plugin in nova is bad (for all the reasons
previously discussed),
Well, I partially disagree. Are you saying that nobody is allowed to run
a plugin in Nova? So what are these plugins in the first place?
Or if you're saying that
We don't have to add a new notification, but we have to add some
new datas in the nova notifications. At least for the delete
instance notification to remove the ceilometer nova notifier.
A while ago, I have registered a blueprint that explains which
datas are missing in the current nova
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
We don't have to add a new notification, but we have to add some
new datas in the nova notifications. At least for the delete
instance notification to remove the ceilometer nova notifier.
A while ago, I have registered a
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
Ceilometer running a plugin in nova is bad (for all the reasons
previously discussed),
Well, I partially disagree. Are you saying that nobody is allowed to run
a plugin in Nova? So
On Wed, Feb 05 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
Dan explained it well in another email.
Is the plugin run in devstack? I couldn't seem to find the code that
enables the ceilometer plugin in nova.
It was in devstack but got removed because it was hanging IIRC. There
was a bug report about that. It
On Wed, Feb 05 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
[…]
Is that right?
Personally, I think #1 is far superior to #2.
++ to #1. I am concerned about the timing of this and don't think we
can do this by icehouse though.
#1 has been on the radar for – at least – a year. I don't have the
courage to dig
On Mon, Feb 03 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
We know, Ceilometer has been broken several times because of that in the
past months. We know we shouldn't do that, but for now we don't have
enough work force to work on a batter solution unfortunately.
Does this issue mean Ceilometer won't work for
Whats the underlying problem here? nova notifications aren't
versioned? Nova should try to support ceilometer's use case so
it sounds like there is may be a nova issue in here as well.
Oh you're far from it.
Long story short, the problem is that when an instance is detroyed,
we need to
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
We know, Ceilometer has been broken several times because of that in the
past months. We know we shouldn't do that, but for now we don't have
enough work force to work on a batter
On 05/02/14 10:07, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Feb 03 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
We know, Ceilometer has been broken several times because of that in the
past months. We know we shouldn't do that, but for now we don't have
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 01:11:10PM -0800, Dan Smith wrote:
Whats the underlying problem here? nova notifications aren't
versioned? Nova should try to support ceilometer's use case so
it sounds like there is may be a nova issue in here as well.
Oh you're far from it.
Long story
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
Hi Joe,
While looking at gate failures trying to improve our classification
rate I stumbled across this:
It's also worth pointing out a related side effect of that choice...
URL:
http://logs.openstack.org/14/68714/3/gate/gate-ceilometer-python27/dc7e987/console.html#_2014-01-30_15_57_30_413
Uploads of branch tarballs are not stable and they're also not
atomic. If your job tries to retrieve that
16 matches
Mail list logo
