On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Matt Riedemann
wrote:
> On 2/11/2017 11:47 AM, John Griffith wrote:
>
>>
>> It seems like just moving Nova to V3 in Pike would alleviate quite a few
>> snarls here. The fact that V3.0 is just pointing back to V2 for Cinder
>> calls anyway
On 2/11/2017 11:47 AM, John Griffith wrote:
It seems like just moving Nova to V3 in Pike would alleviate quite a few
snarls here. The fact that V3.0 is just pointing back to V2 for Cinder
calls anyway I'm uncertain there's a huge downside to this. Nova +
Cinder V2 coverage is only an entry
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> While talking about [1] yesterday and trying to figure out how to
> configure nova to use cinder v3 in the CI jobs in Pike, things got a bit
> messy from the CI job configuration perspective.
>
> My initial plan was to