On 12/03/14 03:17, Xurong Yang wrote:
Hi,Lingxian marios
Thank for response. yes,personally speaking, it should be using UUID
instead of 'name' such as network_id port_id as name(not the key) can't
differentiate security groups. so, i don't know that how about other
folks's view, maybe we
Ok. I think the bug/1289195 cover it, so we can continue the discussion
there.
thanks!Xurong
2014-03-12 15:44 GMT+08:00 mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com:
On 12/03/14 03:17, Xurong Yang wrote:
Hi,Lingxian marios
Thank for response. yes,personally speaking, it should be using UUID
Hi Xurong:
If Neutron is used for security-group functionality, do not come back to
Nova for that. The security-group in Nova is just for backward
compatiblity, IMHO.
2014-03-11 16:20 GMT+08:00 Xurong Yang ido...@gmail.com:
It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name.
so exception
On 11/03/14 10:20, Xurong Yang wrote:
It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name.
so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name.
Hi Xurong - fyi there is a review open which raises this particular
point at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79270/2 (together
Hi,Lingxian marios
Thank for response. yes,personally speaking, it should be using UUID
instead of 'name' such as network_id port_id as name(not the key) can't
differentiate security groups. so, i don't know that how about other
folks's view, maybe we need fix it.
thanks,Xurong
2014-03-11
