On 2/6/2015 7:20 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
Ok, my bad. When I proposed this part of the Nova meeting I was also
thinking about lost patches where a couple of weeks had gone by
without any negative feedback and the patch author got a chance to
advocate for it. That's how we used it in Tempest
Ok, my bad. When I proposed this part of the Nova meeting I was also
thinking about lost patches where a couple of weeks had gone by
without any negative feedback and the patch author got a chance to
advocate for it. That's how we used it in Tempest meetings.
The theory being that engaging in
On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase
Sean Dague said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:30AM -0500:
As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of things.
The slot turned into everyone talking
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:13:50PM +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
I was always considering stuck reviews as reviews where 2 or more cores were
disagreeing between themselves so that it was needing a debate discussion
during the meeting.
I was under the same impression.
Stuck reviews were for
LOL :)
-- dims
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 2/5/2015 10:54 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Le 05/02/2015 17:54, Sean Dague a écrit :
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase
On 02/05/2015 11:50 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
items, then work through them 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one
according to who shouts fastest but ask people not to interrupt.
Or how
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:42:48AM -0600, Ed Leafe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/05/2015 09:02 AM, Alexis Lee wrote:
May I suggest stricter moderation? EG a short phase to propose
items, then work through them 1 by 1. Or, we take items one by one
according
On 05/02/15 15:02, Alexis Lee wrote:
Sean Dague said on Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:51:30AM -0500:
As there has been a bunch of concern around patches getting lost or
stuck, I wanted to re-announce the fact that we've got a dedicated slot
at the weekly Nova meeting for just those sorts of things.
Certainly it was my intent when I created that agenda item to cover
reviews that wouldn't otherwise reach a decision -- either two cores
wedged, or something else that we can't resolve trivially in gerrit.
Now, I can see that people don't like reviews sitting for a long time,
but that's probably
12 matches
Mail list logo
