I have been a fan of this from the very beginning of the project as well. I
think oslo is the obvious correct place for a library that should define
core interfaces for use by many openstack projects.
Also, whether you have seen it or not, I have *definitely* seen real
instances where people shied
On 16/03/17 12:43 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me to bring castellan under Oslo governance with folks from
both oslo and Barbican as reviewers without a project rename. Let's
see if that helps get more adoption of castellan
This sounds like a great path forward! +1
Flavio
Thanks,
D
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
wrote:
> +1 from me. That looks easy to implement and maintain.
>
> On 3/20/17, 2:49 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote:
>
>>Dave,
>>
>>Here's the precendent from oslo.policy:
>>https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/556,members
>>
>>The r
+1 from me. That looks easy to implement and maintain.
On 3/20/17, 2:49 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote:
>Dave,
>
>Here's the precendent from oslo.policy:
>https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/556,members
>
>The reason for setting it up this way with individuals + oslo core +
>keystone core
Dave,
Here's the precendent from oslo.policy:
https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/556,members
The reason for setting it up this way with individuals + oslo core +
keystone core is to make sure both core teams are involved in the
review process and any future contributors who are not part
This sounds good to me. I see it as a "promotion" for Castellan into the
core of OpenStack. I think a good first step in this direction is to
create a castellan-drivers team in Launchpad and a castellan-core team in
Gerrit. We can seed the list with Barbican core reviewers and any Oslo
volunteer
I'd be fine with it also, not sure it will change much, but meh, worth a
shot. We are all happy loving people after all, so might as well try to
help others when we can :-P
-Josh
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me to bring castellan under Oslo governance with folks from
both oslo and Barbican
+1 from me to bring castellan under Oslo governance with folks from
both oslo and Barbican as reviewers without a project rename. Let's
see if that helps get more adoption of castellan
Thanks,
Dims
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Farr, Kaitlin M.
wrote:
> This thread has generated quite the di
This thread has generated quite the discussion, so I will try to
address a few points in this email, echoing a lot of what Dave said.
Clint originally explained what we are trying to solve very well. The hope was
that the rename would emphasize that Castellan is just a basic
interface that suppo
Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Brant Knudson's message of 2017-03-15 10:27:49 -0500:
>> Can the Castellan team be broken out into a new project under the big tent
>> rather than having to go under oslo? Oslo as a catch-all made more sense
>> before the big tent. Also, I always thought part of
On 3/15/17, 6:51 AM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 13 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> To me, Oslo is a bunch of libraries that encompass "the way OpenStack
>> does ". When is key management, projects are, AFAICT,
>>universally
>> using Castellan at the moment. So I think it fits in
Excerpts from Brant Knudson's message of 2017-03-15 10:27:49 -0500:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>
> > Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As
> > >> much a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As
> >> much as I like the uniformity oslo.keymanager would bring, I think it's
> >> already adopt
On Mon, Mar 13 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
> To me, Oslo is a bunch of libraries that encompass "the way OpenStack
> does ". When is key management, projects are, AFAICT, universally
> using Castellan at the moment. So I think it fits in Oslo
> conceptually.
It would be cool if it could rat
On Wed, Mar 15 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> It's a governance problem. Basically if the abstraction layer is under
> the control of the same group as one of the drivers, it's not really an
> abstraction layer, and nobody will adopt it or develop another driver
> for it.
So we hope that by changi
Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
>> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As
>> much as I like the uniformity oslo.keymanager would bring, I think it's
>> already adopted well enough we just want to make it clear that it is
>> blessed a
On Tue, Mar 14 2017, Clint Byrum wrote:
> +1 for just pulling it under the oslo umbrella but not renaming it. As
> much as I like the uniformity oslo.keymanager would bring, I think it's
> already adopted well enough we just want to make it clear that it is
> blessed and ok to adopt.
I don't even
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-14 20:05:54 -0400:
>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-14 19:20:08 -0400:
>> > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-03-13 13:49:22 -0700:
>> > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-14 20:05:54 -0400:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-14 19:20:08 -0400:
> > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-03-13 13:49:22 -0700:
> > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-13 15:12:42 -0400:
> > > > Excerpts
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-14 19:20:08 -0400:
> Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-03-13 13:49:22 -0700:
> > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-13 15:12:42 -0400:
> > > Excerpts from Farr, Kaitlin M.'s message of 2017-03-13 18:55:18 +:
> > > > Propos
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2017-03-13 13:49:22 -0700:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-13 15:12:42 -0400:
> > Excerpts from Farr, Kaitlin M.'s message of 2017-03-13 18:55:18 +:
> > > Proposed library name: Rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager
> > >
> > > Proposed l
Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-13 15:12:42 -0400:
>> Excerpts from Farr, Kaitlin M.'s message of 2017-03-13 18:55:18 +:
>>> When the Barbican team first created the Castellan library, we had
>>> reached out to oslo to see if we could name it oslo.keymanage
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-13 15:12:42 -0400:
> Excerpts from Farr, Kaitlin M.'s message of 2017-03-13 18:55:18 +:
> > Proposed library name: Rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager
> >
> > Proposed library mission/motivation: Castellan's goal is to provide a
> > generic key
Kaitlin,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Farr, Kaitlin M.
wrote:
> Proposed library name: Rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager
>
>
>
> Proposed library mission/motivation: Castellan’s goal is to provide a
>
> generic key manager interface that projects can use for their key
>
> manager needs, e.g
Excerpts from Farr, Kaitlin M.'s message of 2017-03-13 18:55:18 +:
> Proposed library name: Rename Castellan to oslo.keymanager
>
> Proposed library mission/motivation: Castellan's goal is to provide a
> generic key manager interface that projects can use for their key
> manager needs, e.g., s
25 matches
Mail list logo