Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

On Thu, Dec 17 2015, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Just want to +1 all the above. > > It'd be great if we can finally hand the library over to the keystone > team, where I think it belongs. While I have nothing against moving oslo.policy to Keystone, I would like to emphasize that one of the upside

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

Le 16/12/2015 20:33, Davanum Srinivas a écrit : Brant, I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now). The name is very possibly going to create confusion -- Dims I heard some people consider that "OpenStack"

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

Thinking more about it. The only change we'll have is that if someone files a oslo-specs for oslo.policy we need to tell them to switch over to keystone-specs. We could add notes in README etc to make this apparent. So i am +1 to making this move. Brant, other keystone cores, Can you please file

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

On 16/12/15 18:51 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote: For what is is worth, we originally proposed oslo.policy to graduate to Keystone when we were converting to the library. I still think it belongs in keystone (as long as the oslo team doesn't mind that long-term keystone team owns something in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Thinking more about it. The only change we'll have is that if someone > files a oslo-specs for oslo.policy we need to tell them to switch over > to keystone-specs. We could add notes in README etc to make this >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Brant, > > I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core > directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now). > That's certainly reasonable, and kind of what we did with pycadf. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

Brant, I am ok either way, guess the alternative was to add keystone-core directly to the oslo.policy core group (can't check right now). The name is very possibly going to create confusion -- Dims On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > Hi, > I am

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

Hi, I am sure oslo.policy would be good under Keystone's governance. But I am not sure I understood what's wrong in having oslo.policy under the oslo program ? Jordan On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Brant Knudson wrote: > > I'd like to propose moving oslo.policy from the oslo program to the > keystone program. Keystone developers know what's going on with oslo.policy > and I think are more interested in what's going on with it so that reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

As an interim measure, added keystone-core to oslo-policy-core[1] Thanks, Dims [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/556,members On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Davanum Srinivas

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] Move oslo.policy from oslo to keystone

For what is is worth, we originally proposed oslo.policy to graduate to Keystone when we were converting to the library. I still think it belongs in keystone (as long as the oslo team doesn't mind that long-term keystone team owns something in the oslo. namespace). The short term adding