Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-12-08 Thread Li Ma
Hi all, I tried to deploy zeromq by devstack and it definitely failed with lots of problems, like dependencies, topics, matchmaker setup, etc. I've already registered a blueprint for devstack-zeromq [1]. Besides, I suggest to build a wiki page in order to trace all the workitems related with Z

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-18 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/11/14 00:55, Denis Makogon wrote: > > > So if zmq driver support in devstack is fixed, we can easily add a > new job to run them in the same way. > > > Btw this is a good question. I will take look at current state of > zmq in devstack. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-18 Thread ozamiatin
We should build a simple app using the Oslo libraries that we can place in the oslo.messaging source tree to use for exercising the communication patterns of the library with different drivers. Ideally that would be a single app (or set of apps) that could be used to test all drivers, with test

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Denis Makogon
вторник, 18 ноября 2014 г. пользователь Mehdi Abaakouk написал: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Le 2014-11-17 22:53, Doug Hellmann a écrit : > > That’s a good goal, but that’s not what I had in mind for in-tree functional tests. >>> An interesting idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 2014-11-17 22:53, Doug Hellmann a écrit : That’s a good goal, but that’s not what I had in mind for in-tree functional tests. An interesting idea that might be useful that taskflow implemented/has done... The examples @ https://githu

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ok, it depends on what features are needed in said driver. Things like http://redis.io/commands/psetex (and others) that might be used only exist in newer versions > 2.2.0, if these aren't used then it doesn't matter (basic support/functionality exists in 2.2.0 for all the common things). Er

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Eric Windisch
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > It should already be running. > > Tooz has been testing with it[1]. Whats running in ubuntu is an older > redis though so don't expect some of the new > 2.2.0 features to work until > the ubuntu version is pushed out to all projects. The r

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 17, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Denis Makogon wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:26 PM, James Page wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Denis On 17/11/14 07

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Joshua Harlow
Doug Hellmann wrote: On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Denis Makogon wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:26 PM, James Page wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Denis On 17/11/14 07:43, Denis Makogon wrote: During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good qu

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Joshua Harlow
It should already be running. Tooz has been testing with it[1]. Whats running in ubuntu is an older redis though so don't expect some of the new > 2.2.0 features to work until the ubuntu version is pushed out to all projects. https://github.com/stackforge/tooz/blob/master/tooz/drivers/redis.p

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Le 2014-11-17 15:26, James Page a écrit : > > This was discussed in the oslo.messaging summit session, and > > re-enabling zeromq support in devstack is definately on my todo list, > > but I don't think the should block l

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Denis Makogon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:26 PM, James Page wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi Denis >> >> On 17/11/14 07:43, Denis Makogon wrote: >>> During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Denis Makogon
понедельник, 17 ноября 2014 г. пользователь James Page написал: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 17/11/14 09:01, Denis Makogon wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand you statement about them not being > > "gate"-able - the functional/unit tests currently proposed for the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Denis Makogon
понедельник, 17 ноября 2014 г. пользователь Mehdi Abaakouk написал: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 2014-11-17 15:26, James Page a écrit : > >> This was discussed in the oslo.messaging summit session, and >> re-enabling zeromq support in devstack is definately on my to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 17/11/14 09:01, Denis Makogon wrote: > I'm not sure I understand you statement about them not being > "gate"-able - the functional/unit tests currently proposed for the > zmq driver run fine as part of the standard test suite execution - > maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 2014-11-17 15:26, James Page a écrit : This was discussed in the oslo.messaging summit session, and re-enabling zeromq support in devstack is definately on my todo list, but I don't think the should block landing of the currently proposed unit

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Denis Makogon
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Denis Makogon > wrote: > >> Good day, Stackers. >> >> >> During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good >> question about maintaining ZeroMQ driver in upstream (see section “dropping >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Eric Windisch
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Denis Makogon wrote: > Good day, Stackers. > > > During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good question > about maintaining ZeroMQ driver in upstream (see section “dropping ZeroMQ > support in oslo.messaging” at [1]) . As we all know, good thou

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread Denis Makogon
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:26 PM, James Page wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Denis > > On 17/11/14 07:43, Denis Makogon wrote: > > During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good > > question about maintaining ZeroMQ driver in upstream (see secti

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.messaging] ZeroMQ driver maintenance next steps

2014-11-17 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Denis On 17/11/14 07:43, Denis Makogon wrote: > During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good > question about maintaining ZeroMQ driver in upstream (see section > “dropping ZeroMQ support in oslo.messaging” at [1]) . As we