Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra] request for reviews on two requirements changes

2016-04-23 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/23/2016 3:10 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: The reason this change is being submitted is because people are advised to use upper-constraints.txt as the versions that have been tested but they don't always do that. As a result, blocking in requirements.txt is also recommended. Yeah, good point,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra] request for reviews on two requirements changes

2016-04-23 Thread Amrith Kumar
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 12:53 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/23/2016 8:20 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > > Folks, > > > > Changes [1] and [2] blacklist Routes 2.3 in Mitaka and Liberty. They've > > been cherry picked from a change that merged in master. > > > > I would like both changes merged so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][infra] request for reviews on two requirements changes

2016-04-23 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 4/23/2016 8:20 AM, Amrith Kumar wrote: Folks, Changes [1] and [2] blacklist Routes 2.3 in Mitaka and Liberty. They've been cherry picked from a change that merged in master. I would like both changes merged so I can then make corresponding changes in Trove, and then make a Trove (Mitaka)