On 05/21/2017 03:51 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
So I don't see the problem of "consistent utf8 support" having much to
do with whether or not we support Posgtresql - you of course need your
"CREATE DATABASE" to include the utf8 charset like we do on MySQL, but
that's it.
That's where we stand
On 05/18/2017 02:49 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/18/2017 01:02 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
On 05/17/2017 02:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Some of the concerns/feedback has been "please describe things that are
harder by this being an abstraction", so examples are provided.
so let's go through this
On 05/18/2017 01:02 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
>
> On 05/17/2017 02:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> Some of the concerns/feedback has been "please describe things that are
>> harder by this being an abstraction", so examples are provided.
>
> so let's go through this list:
>
> - OpenStack services
On 05/17/2017 02:38 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
Some of the concerns/feedback has been "please describe things that are
harder by this being an abstraction", so examples are provided.
so let's go through this list:
- OpenStack services taking a more active role in managing the DBMS
,
On 05/15/2017 07:16 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> We had a forum session in Boston on Postgresql and out of that agreed to
> the following steps forward:
>
> 1. explicitly warn in operator facing documentation that Postgresql is
> less supported than MySQL. This was deemed better than just removing
>
