On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:14:19PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
> >
> >> One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on
> >> the phases as well. Honestly 2
On 2017-09-28 11:13:56 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
> I can see a policy looked more like:
>
> Phase Time frameSummary Changes Supported
> I 0-12 months Maintained release All bugfixes (that meet the
> after release criteria described
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2017 08:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level
> > > of
> > > support for stable branches th
On 09/27/2017 08:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level of
support for stable branches than most of OpenStack. My understanding is
that a lot of the current stable branch
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
>
>> One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on
>> the phases as well. Honestly 2 weeks for trailing for just GA is hard
>> enough. Let alone the fact that
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level of
> support for stable branches than most of OpenStack. My understanding is
> that a lot of the current stable branch policy came out of the fact that
> there w
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote:
> One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on
> the phases as well. Honestly 2 weeks for trailing for just GA is hard
> enough. Let alone the fact that the actual end-users are 18+ months
> behind. For some dep
On 09/27/2017 11:39 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for
If we
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Alex Schultz wrote:
[...]
> We'll need to re-evaulate what stable-policy means for tripleo. We
> don't want to allow the world for backporting but we also want to
> reduce the patches carried downstream for specific use cases. I think
> in the case of 3rd party i
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds
>> wrote:
>> > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for
>>
>> If we have to give up backports that h
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for
>
> If we have to give up backports that help customers to get
> production-ready environments, I would c
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
> With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for
If we have to give up backports that help customers to get
production-ready environments, I would consider giving up stable
policy tag which probably doesn't fit for project
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 06:55:13AM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 06:58 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Newton is officially EOL next month:
> > https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series
> >
> > As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the
> > revie
On 09/26/2017 06:58 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Newton is officially EOL next month:
> https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series
>
> As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the
> reviews for stable/newton before it's too late.
> This email is a reminder and a
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:58:46AM -0600, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Newton is officially EOL next month:
> https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series
>
> As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the
> reviews for stable/newton before it's too late.
> This email is
15 matches
Mail list logo