On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 7:22:23 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
TL;DR: Gate is failing 23% of the time due to bugs in nova, neutron
and tempest. We need help fixing these bugs.
Hi All,
Before going any further we have a bug that is affecting gate and
stable, so its getting top priority here.
Joe,
Looks like we may be a bit more stable now?
Short URL: http://bit.ly/18qq4q2
Long URL :
I had the labels wrong - here's a slightly better link - http://bit.ly/1gdxYeg
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe,
Looks like we may be a bit more stable now?
Short URL: http://bit.ly/18qq4q2
Long URL :
Hi Clark,
2013/11/21 Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com:
Joe seemed to be on the same track with
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:57578,n,z
but went far enough to revert the change that introduced that test. A
couple people were
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:53:45 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
address these bugs.
We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
Monday's Neutron team meeting and am trying to shop it
On 20/11/13 14:21, Anita Kuno wrote:
Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can
address these bugs.
We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448.
We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at
Monday's
Hey all,
I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
storage. Please check out this snippet [1].
This is how we use eventlet TLS in Nova and common Oslo code [2]. This
could explain how [3] actually breaks TripleO devtest story and our
gates.
Am I right? Or I am missing
Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances are
the actual coroutine local storage.
Alex
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hey all,
I think I found a serious bug in our usage of eventlet thread local
storage. Please
On 11/20/2013 12:21 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Nope, you're totally right, corolocal.local is a class, whose instances
are the actual coroutine local storage.
But I don't think his example is what is being used.
Here is an example using the openstack.common.local module, which is
what nova uses
We settled on 1251920.
https://review.openstack.org/57509 is the fix for that bug.
Note that Oslo was fixed on Jun 28th, nova hasn't synced since then.
If we were using oslo as a library we would have had the fix as soon
as olso did a release.
These are the references to strong_store - and thus
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without pending
patches, and many recent hits) that we are hitting. Gate won't be stable,
and
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joe,
2013/11/20 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
As many of you have noticed the gate has been in very bad shape over the
past few days. Here is a list of some of the top open bugs (without pending
14 matches
Mail list logo
