Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, John Villalovos wrote: > Does this mean we can now get more user friendly names for the log files? > > Currently I see names like: > screen-dstat.txt.gz > screen-etcd.txt.gz > screen-g-api.txt.gz > screen-g-reg.txt.gz >

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

Miguel- Sean was in favor of that, and I started looking into it for plain pdb, but it barely seemed worth it - it would wind up being like three LOC. I definitely wouldn't oppose it, though. Please add me to that review if you go for it. What seemed more interesting to me was a

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

I wonder if it makes sense to provide a helper script to do what it's explained on the document. So we could ~/devstack/tools/run_locally.sh n-sch. If yes, I'll send the patch. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > Oh, are we talking about the logs produced

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

Oh, are we talking about the logs produced by CI jobs? I thought we were talking about on your local devstack itself. Because there, I don't think you shouldn't be seeing log files like this anymore. Logging is done via systemd and can be viewed via journalctl [1]. The exceptions are things

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

I would love to. Those were mostly left because devstack-gate (and related tooling like elasticsearch) is not branch aware, so things get ugly on the conditionals for changing expected output files. That might be a good popup infra topic at PTG. On 09/08/2017 04:17 PM, John Villalovos wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

Does this mean we can now get more user friendly names for the log files? Currently I see names like: screen-dstat.txt.gz screen-etcd.txt.gz screen-g-api.txt.gz screen-g-reg.txt.gz screen-ir-api.txt.gz screen-ir-cond.txt.gz screen-keystone.txt.gz screen-n-api-meta.txt.gz screen-n-api.txt.gz

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/07/2017 04:54 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > >> All- >> >> The plain pdb doc patch [1] is merging. >> >> On clarkb's suggestion, I took a look at remote-pdb [2], and it >> turned >> out to be easy-peasy to use. I

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On 09/07/2017 04:54 PM, Eric Fried wrote: All- The plain pdb doc patch [1] is merging. On clarkb's suggestion, I took a look at remote-pdb [2], and it turned out to be easy-peasy to use. I submitted a followon doc patch for that [3]. Thanks, John, for speaking up and

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

All- The plain pdb doc patch [1] is merging. On clarkb's suggestion, I took a look at remote-pdb [2], and it turned out to be easy-peasy to use. I submitted a followon doc patch for that [3]. Thanks, John, for speaking up and getting this rolling.

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 09/07/2017 01:52 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > >> John- >> >> You're not the only one for whom the transition to systemd has >> been >> painful. >> >> However... >> >> It *is* possible (some would argue just

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Eric Fried wrote: > John- > > You're not the only one for whom the transition to systemd has been > painful. > > However... > > It *is* possible (some would argue just as easy) to do all things > with > systemd that

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On 09/07/2017 01:52 PM, Eric Fried wrote: John- You're not the only one for whom the transition to systemd has been painful. However... It *is* possible (some would argue just as easy) to do all things with systemd that were done with screen. For starters,

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

I completely agree with you here John. I still prefer to use screen for my devstack installs, it's just far far easier to use for development. systemd is a pain to use in comparison. This is a major step backwards for developers. :( On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:29 PM, John Griffith

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

John- You're not the only one for whom the transition to systemd has been painful. However... It *is* possible (some would argue just as easy) to do all things with systemd that were done with screen. For starters, have you seen [1] ? Though looking at

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

​FWIW I realize my opinion doesn't count here particularly since this already merged, BUT I also realize that it didn't count before it merged either as the response I was given was "I don't use debuggers". It's unfortunate, perhaps I'm really the only one that has counter opinions on

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, John Griffith wrote: > Please don't, some of us have no issues with screen and use it extensively > for debugging. Unless there's a viable option using systemd I fail to > understand why this is such a big deal. I've been using

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

Please don't, some of us have no issues with screen and use it extensively for debugging. Unless there's a viable option using systemd I fail to understand why this is such a big deal. I've been using devstack in screen for a long time without issue, and I still use rejoin that supposedly didn't

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

w00t! On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 08/31/2017 06:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> The work that started last cycle to make devstack only have a single >> execution mode, that was the same between automated QA and local, is >> nearing it's completion. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] removing screen from devstack - RSN

On 08/31/2017 06:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > The work that started last cycle to make devstack only have a single > execution mode, that was the same between automated QA and local, is > nearing it's completion. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499186/ is the patch that will remove > screen