Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Documentation accuracy rating

2012-05-15 Thread Anne Gentle
Great input, more comments below. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Razique Mahroua razique.mahr...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the informations, please see my comments Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org 7 mai 2012 22:32 Ok, that makes perfect sense to me. I'll do a first pass. Here are some

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Documentation accuracy rating

2012-05-07 Thread Anne Gentle
Ok, that makes perfect sense to me. I'll do a first pass. Here are some things that stick out of me from the last five months of analytics. - The Starter Guide for Diablo still gets a huge number of hits. It's also a popular landing page That guide will be updated for Essex this week. I expect a

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Documentation accuracy rating

2012-05-06 Thread Lorin Hochstein
Hi Anne: It's good to know the analytics data is there if we want to dig deeper. However, until somebody working on docs starts asking specific analytics-driven questions about the site usage, it's probably not worth setting up an automatic report emailed to the team. At least, I know I

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Documentation accuracy rating

2012-05-03 Thread Lorin Hochstein
On May 3, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Razique Mahroua wrote: Hey there, just had that silly idea : is it possible to rank/ note some part of the documentations ? The logic here is to gather from readers what are the pages they often read, and how much accurate they are . That would help to update