Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A reminder about the compare-xml job for JJB

2014-09-03 Thread James E. Blair
"Bailey, Darragh" writes: > Hi, > > Any chance that zuul could report back a 'WARNING' in yellow for non-voting > jobs that fail? Still useful to know that it ran. > > Seems just a little too easy to miss that the text is different. Sure, we're actually just overriding 'SUCCESS' and 'FAILURE',

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A reminder about the compare-xml job for JJB

2014-09-03 Thread Bailey, Darragh
Hi, Any chance that zuul could report back a 'WARNING' in yellow for non-voting jobs that fail? Still useful to know that it ran. Seems just a little too easy to miss that the text is different. Regards, Darragh Bailey "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - Unknown On 03

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A reminder about the compare-xml job for JJB

2014-09-02 Thread Zaro
Thanks for the reminder Jim. I think it would be helpful if zuul reported a message back to gerrit only if the xml output has changed. Something like "builder-compare-xml job reported changes in xml output for OpenStack jobs". On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:02 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > Je

[OpenStack-Infra] A reminder about the compare-xml job for JJB

2014-09-02 Thread James E. Blair
Hi, Jenkins-job-builder runs a job called "jenkins-job-builder-compare-xml" which runs JJB master against openstack's JJB config, then runs it again with the proposed change and compares the output. Instead of success/failure, what it does is reports whether the output changed or not. If you fol