Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Tri-Weekly IRC meetings?

Stig Telfer wrote: > In the Scientific WG we now have 3 co-chairs - one in Australia, one in the > USA and one in the UK. We are interested in arranging IRC meetings in 3 time > zones, ie tri-weekly time slots. Is that achievable? > > One potential issue I can see is that scheduling a

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OpenStack-docs] Training guides meeting @Barcelona Summit

Hello, IMO if there is an IRC meeting on every week with alternating times for odd and even weeks, having two bi-weekly schedules with alternating times would be self-explanatory. However, if the meeting frequency would be just one or two in a month, then referring such as n-th week in every

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Please add member to networking-fortinet-release group

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Jerry Zhao wrote: > Hi Infra team: > > Please add the following member to networking-fortinet-release group. > > Jerry Zhao: xyzje...@gmail.com > > Jun Li: j...@fortinet.com Just following up from our quick conversation on IRC so others know this was done.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [OpenStack-docs] Training guides meeting @Barcelona Summit

Hi, I like the ISO week numbers better. I think it’s more consistent, gives a regular cadence and does not cause confusions with having a meeting on the 5th week or not for instance. My 2 cents. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó > On 2016. Nov 9., at 20:21, Ian Y. Choi

[OpenStack-Infra] Please add member to networking-fortinet-release group

Hi Infra team: Please add the following member to networking-fortinet-release group. Jerry Zhao: xyzje...@gmail.com Jun Li: j...@fortinet.com Thanks! ___ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Logs for Ask.O.o - chasing false positive spam labeling

On 2016-11-08 19:12:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote: [...] > Upstream apparently revamped the spam system in the version marked > to upgrade to in: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274032/ I've gone ahead and approved this just now... I was unaware it was out there waiting for approval.

[OpenStack-Infra] [I18n] Regarding Zanata upgrade plan to 3.9.6 with Xenial: Help is needed

Hello, I18n team currently uses Zanata in translate.openstack.org so frequently as an OpenStack translation platform. I really appreciate great help from all contributors, especially infra team members and Zanata development team :

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Logs for Ask.O.o - chasing false positive spam labeling

On 2016-11-09 19:53:27 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-11-09 18:11:39 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-11-08 19:12:32 +0800 (+0800), Tom Fifield wrote: > > [...] > > > Upstream apparently revamped the spam system in the version marked > > > to upgrade to in: > > >

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Tri-Weekly IRC meetings?

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:56:38AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Our scheduling system currently only supports biweekly or weekly > meetings. We don't currently support monthly or triweekly meetings > (mostly to avoid having to detect complex conflicts with biweekly meetings). > > I guess we

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] JJB V2.0 planning

Hi Everyone, I'd like to keep the momentum of JJB 2.0 work going as we're so close to the finish line. This Friday we're going to continue our sprint in #openstack-sprint for those who can make it. Wayne suggested we send a status to the mailing list for those who can't. To summarize some of the

[OpenStack-Infra] Tri-Weekly IRC meetings?

Hi All - In the Scientific WG we now have 3 co-chairs - one in Australia, one in the USA and one in the UK. We are interested in arranging IRC meetings in 3 time zones, ie tri-weekly time slots. Is that achievable? One potential issue I can see is that scheduling a tri-weekly slot would