Hi,
Found this thread in the archive so a bit of a late reaction.
We are hitting the same thing so I created a blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-local-storage-quota
If you guys already found a nice solution to this problem I’d like to hear it :)
Robert van Leeuwen
eBay
Hi Jonathan,
The openvswitch-agent is out of sync on compute 4, try restarting it.
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 17:43, Jonathan Proulx wrote:
>
>
> I have an odd issue that seems to just be affecting one private
> network for one tenant, though I saw a similar thing on a
I have an odd issue that seems to just be affecting one private
network for one tenant, though I saw a similar thing on a different
project network recently which I 'fixed' by rebooting the hypervisor.
Since this has now (maybe) happened twice I figure I should try to
understand what it is.
Hi,
it sounds somewhat-obvious from ‘MultipleHostsWithOneIPError’ , but you have
defined same IP address for infra1, compute1 and storage1.
According to your yaml definition file those are defined to be 3 physical
machines/3 VMs and they can’t have same IP address.
It is fairly-likely that
Greetings All -
We have a Scientific WG IRC meeting on Wednesday at 0900 UTC on channel
#openstack-meeting
The agenda is available here[1] and full IRC meeting details are here[2].
We’d like to follow up on the events at Barcelona, and complete our planning of
activity areas for the Ocata
Daniel,
Thanks for your suggestions.
Yes, there is a plan to do several more types of research in very similar areas.
Best
—
Vlad
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 12:37, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Vlad Nykytiuk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As you
Dear all,
We are still looking for a final slot for our bi-weekly IRC meeting and thus we
have to postpone our first meeting to a date to be determined (hopefully next
week, i.e. Wednesday Nov the 16th).
I will come back to you with the final time as soon as possible.
Meanwhile, you can
Great staff folks!
Looking forward to reviewing the results of the doodle.
Thanks,
Edgar Magana,
User Committee
On 11/8/16, 7:04 AM, "Saverio Proto" wrote:
Hello Everyone,
we just had the Ops Meetup Team IRC meeting.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 02:12:14PM -0800, Kevin Benton wrote:
:Which version of Neutron are you on now? Changing the config options had no
:impact on existing networks in Mitaka. After updating the config, only new
:networks will be affected. You will need to use an SQL query to update the
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> [...]
> That said, it's a balancing act and we may be past the point when
> scheduling pain takes over the need to spread meetings out. I'll do a
> quick pass to try to free up slots taken by dead meetings, and if we
> can't free enough slots we'll likely add a new meeting
Hello Everyone,
we just had the Ops Meetup Team IRC meeting.
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ops_meetups_team/2016/ops_meetups_team.2016-11-08-14.03.html
There are two possible venues for the next OpenStack Operators
Mid-Cycle meetup: Milano and Tokyo.
To select the venue we created
Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> Devil's advocate - what is "full enough"? Surely another channel is
> essentially free and having flexibility in available timing is of utmost
> importance?
See
http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/open-community.html#public-meetings-on-irc
That said, it's a
On 07-11-16 17:42:02, Lee Yarwood wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The following bug was recently discovered where encrypted volumes
> created prior to Newton use a slightly mangled passphrase :
>
> The passphrase used to encrypt or decrypt volumes was mangled prior to Newton
>
see you on IRC in ~1/2 hour!
Chris
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> By my clock, this is in about an hour from now.
>
>
> On 05/11/16 08:26, Chris Morgan wrote:
>
>> You're right, my mistake. 9am Tuesday (for me)! See you then
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Sent from
UTC does not care about DST good people. Just a reminder for those of us who do
observe DST that the meeting is one hour earlier than previously:
http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?pl=1=5128581,100,4699066,5746545=5128581
Meeting is always 1400 UTC should clear up any future concerns :)
--
Melvin
UTC does not care about DST good people. Just a reminder for those of us who do
observe DST that the meeting is one hour earlier than previously:
http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?pl=1=5128581,100,4699066,5746545=5128581
Meeting is always 1400 UTC should clear up any future concerns :)
--
Melvin
UTC does not care about DST good people. Just a reminder for those of us who do
observe DST that the meeting is one hour earlier than previously:
http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?pl=1=5128581,100,4699066,5746545=5128581
Meeting is always 1400 UTC should clear up any future concerns :)
--
Melvin
By my clock, this is in about an hour from now.
On 05/11/16 08:26, Chris Morgan wrote:
You're right, my mistake. 9am Tuesday (for me)! See you then
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 4, 2016, at 8:07 PM, Saverio Proto wrote:
Hello Chris,
Thanks for clarify the meeting
Thanks, Pawel!
—
Vlad
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 09:53, Koniszewski, Pawel
> wrote:
>
> Adding operators list, as it might be interesting for them. Please note that
> some of tested options are not available in nova, i.e., XBZRLE and
> postcopy-after-precopy.
Devil's advocate - what is "full enough"? Surely another channel is
essentially free and having flexibility in available timing is of utmost
importance?
On 8 Nov 2016 5:37 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:52:43PM +0100, lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo