Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

This cracked me up! "Mountain Dew learned the hard way when 4 Chan took control of a vote to name a new flavor, and the joke was on Taylor Swift and VH1 when the Internet chose a school for the deaf

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

+2 On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 04/10/2017 02:10 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: > >> The naming is based on community input and there's good reason to believe >> that in this round of voting both of these values will get a low score. >> >> But, we

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

On 04/10/2017 02:10 PM, Amrith Kumar wrote: The naming is based on community input and there's good reason to believe that in this round of voting both of these values will get a low score. But, we could have a repeat of the Boaty McBoatface debacle  I would totally vote for OpenStack Boaty

Re: [Openstack-operators] FW: [quotas] Unified Limits Conceptual Spec RFC

Sending out a heads up that the initial spec [0] merged. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440815/ On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > For those that are interested in nested quotas, there is proposal on how > to address this forming in openstack-dev (and

Re: [Openstack-operators] about the R release name

Legit point. +1 Vote Rambler. No one's owned a rambler in like 50 years. =P On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello Ops, > > I got the mail about the Poll for OpenStack R Release Naming > > I am shocked that there are proposed names like Raspberry

[Openstack-operators] about the R release name

Hello Ops, I got the mail about the Poll for OpenStack R Release Naming I am shocked that there are proposed names like Raspberry or Root ! Think about troubleshooting and searching on google: Openstack Raspberry "string of log file" The Raspberry or Root words are anti-google words that will

[Openstack-operators] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

[Openstack-operators] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1]

[Openstack-operators] [telecom-nfv] Boston Summit Working Group Session

Hi All, Just FYI, we do have a session time at the summit: http://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/17636/openstack-operators-telecomnfv-working-group-session It's possible I missed being alerted to the fact that our request was accepted. I didn't notice it until the

[Openstack-operators] Reminder User Committee Meeting

Hey everyone, User Committee will meet today in #openstack-meeting @ 1900UTC. If you have any requests for agenda items you can reply to this email or message any of the UC members via email as well as IRC - #openstack-uc -- Kind regards, OpenStack UC