Hi everybody!
As the subject reads, the "T" release of OpenStack is officially
"Train". Unlike recent choices Train was the popular choice so
congrats!
Thanks to everybody who participated and help with the naming process.
Lets make OpenStack Train the release so awesome that people can't
Hello all!
The results of the naming poll are in!
**PLEASE REMEMBER** that these now have to go through legal vetting. So
it is too soon to say 'OpenStack Train' is our next release, given that
previous polls have had some issues with the top choice.
In any case, the names will be sent off
Hi all,
Time is running out for you to have your say in the T release name
poll. We have just under 3 days left. If you haven't voted please do!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:40:25PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:25:02AM -0700, iain macdonnell wrote:
> I must be losing it. On what planet is "Tiny Town" a single word, and
> "Troublesome" not more than 10 characters?
Sorry for the mistake. Should either of these names win the popular
vote clearly they would not be viable.
Yours
Hi folks,
It is time again to cast your vote for the naming of the T Release.
As with last time we'll use a public polling option over per user private URLs
for voting. This means, everybody should proceed to use the following URL to
cast their vote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 05:35:39PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hello all,
> As per [1] the nomination period for names for the T release have
> now closed (actually 3 days ago sorry). The nominated names and any
> qualifying remarks can be seen at2].
>
> Proposed N
Hello all,
As per [1] the nomination period for names for the T release have
now closed (actually 3 days ago sorry). The nominated names and any
qualifying remarks can be seen at2].
Proposed Names
* Tarryall
* Teakettle
* Teller
* Telluride
* Thomas
* Thornton
* Tiger
* Tincup
*
Hey everybody,
Once again, it is time for us to pick a name for our "T" release.
Since the associated Summit will be in Denver, the Geographic
Location has been chosen as "Colorado" (State).
Nominations are now open. Please add suitable names to
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:12:57PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-08-31 01:13:58 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
> [...]
> > What needs to be done for this is full topic categories support
> > under `options` page so people get to filter emails properly.
> [...]
>
> Unfortunately, topic
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:12:21AM +0200, Ignazio Cassano wrote:
> Hi Tony, I sent log file and script yesterday. I hope you received them.
Sorry I can't find them in any of my inboxes :(
Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 08:13:39AM +0200, Ignazio Cassano wrote:
> Tony, do you mean the script I am using to create the image ?
Yup, it'd be good to try and reproduce this outside your environment as
that'll make fixing the underlying bug quicker.
Yours Tony.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 07:55:13AM +0200, Ignazio Cassano wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> applying the patch reported here (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561740/)
> the issue is solved..
> The above path was related to another issue (distutils) but is solves also
> the cleanup error.
> Anycase I could
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 12:25:24PM +0200, Ignazio Cassano wrote:
> Hi All,
> I just installed disk-image builder on my centos 7.
> For creating centos7 image I am using the same command used 3 o 4 months
> ago, but wiith the last diskimage-builder installed with pip I got the
> following error:
>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Volodymyr Litovka wrote:
> Hi colleagues,
>
> does anybody here know how to prepare Ubuntu Artful (17.10) image using
> diskimage-builder?
>
> diskimage-builder use the following naming style for download -
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:52:43PM +0100, lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We are still looking for an irc channel for our meeting:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393899
> There is no available channels for the slot we selected during our
> face-to-face meeting in Barcelona.
>
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:15:18PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'll start by acknowledging that this is a big and complex issue and I
> do not claim to be across all the view points, nor do I claim to be
> particularly persuasive ;P
>
> Having stated t
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:49:14PM -0500, Shamail Tahir wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Per our conversation at the summit, the ops-tags team will now start
> holding regular meetings with the hopes of increasing participation and/or
> number of reviews. The team will meet the second Thursday of every
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 07:16:43PM -0600, Matt Fischer wrote:
I'm not excited about making this the default until token revocations don't
impact performance the way that they do now. I don't know how often this
would get exercised though, but the impact of 100+ token revokes is
noticeable on
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:24:10PM -0600, Matt Fischer wrote:
It was covered some here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-July/069658.html
and some graphs here: http://www.mattfischer.com/blog/?p=672
tl;dr is that having revoked tokens affects keystone token validation
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 01:34:03PM -0400, Andrew Laski wrote:
I'm only one data point, but we have a short TTL on tokens so it is not
something that our users could reasonably due. And the Nova default TTL is
10 minutes, which is also out of bookmarking range IMO.
So that's a good point. If
20 matches
Mail list logo
