Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

mod_wsgi is compiled to a specific python for Apache. It's a single process (with multiple forks). It looks like the upstream solution to running different pythons with mod_wsgi is to either use mod_wsgi-express to launch a new apache+mod_wsgi per-application, or to modify wsgi script (

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Automatically generate sample configuration files (oslo config generator)

Hi, The generation of Neutron configuration files using the oslo config generator is being introduced in Mitaka as part of blueprint [1] and bug [2]. This is broken down into two phases: Neutron core and Neutron *aaS projects. The first part of the first phase is the generation of sample core

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron Multiple gateways instances source routing

Hi Salvatore, thank you for your reply. I'm aware that it works with static routes, I would like to know if it does source routing http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html Anyway I solved it using a script inside the instance. Regards, Pedro Sousa On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Salvatore

[Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

This post is being sent again to the operators mailing list, and i apologize if it's duplicated for some folks. The original thread is here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-November/080816.html In the Mitaka release, the keystone team will be removing functionality that

[Openstack-operators] [nova] [ux] [neutron] Results Presentation: Nova Networks to Neutron Migration Study

Hi Folks, I wanted to let you know about a results presentation for the Nova Networks to Neutron Migration Study this Tuesday, December 1st at 10AM MST / 12PM EST / 5:00PM UTC. The purpose of this study was to gather data to help better understand the attributes of OpenStack users who remain

Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

I have an objection to eventlet going away. We have problems with running Apache and mod_wsgi with multiple python virtual environments. In some of our stacks we're running both Horizon and Keystone. Each get their own virtual environment. Apache mod_wsgi doesn't really work that way, so we'd have

Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

On 1 December 2015 at 09:36, Jesse Keating wrote: > I have an objection to eventlet going away. We have problems with running > Apache and mod_wsgi with multiple python virtual environments. In some of > our stacks we're running both Horizon and Keystone. Each get their own >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

I don't have a problem with eventlet itself going away, but I do feel that keystone should pick a python based web server capable of running WSGI apps ( such as uWSGI ) for the reference implementation rather than Apache which can be declared appropriately in the requirements.txt of the project.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

100% agree. We should look at uwsgi as the reference architecture.  Nginx/Apache/etc should be interchangeable, and up to the operator which they choose to use.  Hell, with tcp load balancing now in opensource Nginx, I could get rid of Apache and HAProxy by utilizing uwsgi. John On November

Re: [Openstack-operators] [keystone] Removing functionality that was deprecated in Kilo and upcoming deprecated functionality in Mitaka

Trying to summarize here... - There isn't much interest in keeping eventlet around. - Folks are OK with running keystone in a WSGI server, but feel they are constrained by Apache. - uWSGI could help to support multiple web servers. My opinion: - Adding support for uWSGI definitely

[Openstack-operators] devstack install Openstack on CENTOS 7 hungs

Hi! I'm a newbie to Openstack. I deploy Openstack use devstack on CENTOS 7(http://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/),when I run ./stack.sh, some error occur: 2015-11-30 07:46:57.699 | Collecting pycadf===1.1.0 (from -c /opt/stack/requirements/upper-constraints.txt (line 236)) 2015-11-30

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Hi everyone, The Product WG is finalizing our mid-cycle plans and I wanted to confirm the conclusion of this thread to bring into that discussion... Reviewing the numerous responses here, it seems like the majority opted for option #1 (one 'official' ops mid-cycle but not precluding regional

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OpenStack-docs] [networking-guide] IRC Meeting

I think 16 UTC works well for most of the US, but doesn't include APAC and probably not ideal for EU because it bumps into Friday evening. How about alternating US/EU and APAC meetings every other week (similar to other documentation meetings) and move the US/EU meeting to another day? On Sun,