Hey folks,
I am the PTL for a project called Kolla. We are currently a stackforge project
but our developer community has tripled in size in the last few months. Our
community mission was originally to “containerize OpenStack” but the next
logical step after OpenStack is containerized is
This is an open invitation to Operators that have an interest in contributing
to the Kolla design around deployment to participate in a 2 day design focused
midcycle summit. The hours will run from 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM PST and the
location will be in San Jose, CA in the US. The two days will
).
Regards
-steve
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Steven Dake (stdake)
std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I am the PTL for a project called Kolla. We are currently a stackforge project
but our developer community has tripled in size in the last few
Hey operators!
The Kolla team is having a mid-cycle event in San Jose, CA. Coffee is provided
throughout the day (I believe, but not certain on this point), and lunch, soda,
water are provided at lunch time. An RSVP dinner is provided the night of July
28th at 7 PM so food costs should be
The Kolla community is pleased to announce the release of the Kolla Liberty 3
milestone. This release fixes 90 bugs and implements 16 blueprints!
During Liberty 3, Kolla joined the big tent governance! Our project can be
found here:
Hi folks,
Unfortunately I won't be able to make it to the Operator midcycle because of
budget constraints or I would find the answer to this question there. The
Kolla upstream is busy sorting out external ssl termination and a question
arose in the Kolla community around operator requirements
<mailto:openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] Question about how Operators deploy
Hi,
We also use two VIPs for tracking and security reasons a +1 for two VIP
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016, 21:00 Robert Starmer
<rob...@kumul.us<mailto:rob...@kumul.us
Joseph,
Comments inline.
From: Joseph Bajin >
Date: Monday, May 2, 2016 at 8:06 PM
To: OpenStack Operators
>
Subject: [Openstack-operators] [osops] OSOps
On 5/13/16, 10:46 AM, "Joshua Harlow" <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>>
>> On 5/12/16, 2:04 PM, "Joshua Harlow"<harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there all-ye-operators,
>>>
>>&g
On 5/13/16, 11:15 AM, "Tim Bell" wrote:
>On 13/05/16 19:48, "Joshua Harlow" wrote:
>
>>Matthew Thode wrote:
>>> On 05/12/2016 04:04 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Hi there all-ye-operators,
I am investigating how to help move godaddy from rpms
On 5/12/16, 2:04 PM, "Joshua Harlow" wrote:
>Hi there all-ye-operators,
>
>I am investigating how to help move godaddy from rpms to a
>container-like solution (virtualenvs, lxc, or docker...) and a set of
>questions that comes up is the following (and I would think that
ts "opinionated" for easy
install but supports being unopinionated, but some ops wont read past the first
part of the sentence. The reaction to the word opinionated can be that strong.
Best to just claim unopinionated with an easy install option or something like
that.
Thanks,
Kevin
___
On 7/31/16, 7:13 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 07/29/2016 11:35 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> In Kolla we have a significant bug in that Horizon can't be used because
>> it requires a member user. We have
Saverio,
We sorted this out in Kolla with the Nova community defining the upgrade
process. Michal (cc) led that work in the Kolla community. I believe you
need to upgrade compute ahead of other services so the upgrade works
properly, but I'm not certain.
Regards
-steve
On 8/5/16, 9:05 AM,
Jay,
I don’t see a reference to the wiki page in your email and don’t immediately
see the LCOO working group wiki. From what you describe this working group is
not working within the framework of the 4 opens which is one of OpenStack’s
fundamental philosophies.
Thanks for bringing up your
files.
Hope the information is useful.
Thanks for the tight feedback loop :)
Regards
-steve
On 7/31/16, 6:13 PM, "Blair Bethwaite" <blair.bethwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Sounds like a recipe for confusion?
>
>On 1 August 2016 at 10:23, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cis
Hey folks,
We are deprecating the fedora implementation in newton, and it will be removed
in Ocata. Reference:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369184/
Since nobody seems to complain it is not working, it seems not worthwhile to
maintain it. At present the fedora implementation is broken.
Michal had asked me if we were good to proceed with this deprecation. As there
are no objections in the mailing list or review, we have decided to proceed
with this (hopefully) operator-invisible change.
Regards
-steve
On 10/3/16, 1:32 PM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote:
Christian,
Serious apologies for lag in response. I just caught this mail today. If you
are still suffering with this problem, drop by #openstack-kolla on irc and we
can see if we can get you going. Note we do recommend 3 nodes for HA
deployments, not 2 (this is one of the reasons).
19 matches
Mail list logo