Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

+1 for *quantifiable output(s)* as 'measure of success' for successful working groups. TL;DR= Disclaimer: the below is mostly anecdotal, very happy to engage in a conversation for what others feel are patterns of success for a [User]-WG. For example, WGs which have clear outputs like the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

So judging from the Doodle poll results, 1400 UTC bi-weekly on a Wednesday is the favourite choice. I will go ahead and book one of the IRC meeting rooms. Once that's done, I'll put together a draft agenda for a first meeting, and publicise to the lists again. Thanks for all your input so far !

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

Hi Stefano I think there are a number of goals that the WG can focus on, both technical and collaborative, and that will be one of the first items to work through. At a very high level I see this as being important to represent the interests of the growing public cloud community on an ongoing

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

Hello folks, On 11/15/2016 02:43 AM, matt Jarvis wrote: > I'd like to propose that, in line with the new process for creation of > working groups, we set up some initial IRC meetings for all interested > parties. I'll be glad to read summaries and participate to conversations on the mailing

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

Whoops, just realised I can't send to these lists with multiple additional recipients, so sending again separately .. Thank you for all of your interest in this proposal. In order to move things to the next stage I need to organise a first IRC meeting, and I think it's probably most appropriate

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

I'm interested as well :) From: matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 11:43 AM To: OpenStack Operators; user-committee Subject: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group So after inpu

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

Sign me up. -James On 15/11/16 23:43, matt Jarvis wrote: > So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd > very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, > with the very high level goal of representing the interests of the > public cloud provider

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

ilto:mna...@vexxhost.com] >Skickat: den 15 november 2016 16:30 >Till: m...@mattjarvis.org.uk >Kopia: OpenStack Operators; user-committee >Ämne: Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working >Group > >This sounds very interesting, put us down! :) > >On Tue,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group This sounds very interesting, put us down! :) On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:43 AM, matt Jarvis <m...@mattjarvis.org.uk> wrote: > So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd > very much like to try and put toget

Re: [Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

This sounds very interesting, put us down! :) On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:43 AM, matt Jarvis wrote: > So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very > much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the > very high level goal

[Openstack-operators] [publicClouds-wg] Public Cloud Working Group

So after input from a variety of sources over the last few weeks, I'd very much like to try and put together a public cloud working group, with the very high level goal of representing the interests of the public cloud provider community around the globe. I'd like to propose that, in line with