+1It is important that we distinguish between those who might contribute to the development of OpenStack, who often have advancedlanguage skills, as contrasted with those who might be asked to operate a cloud based on OpenStack. While it may be that the languageof open source development is
Could we get these links added to the splash onhttps://launchpad.net/openstack? I'm sure this is a rather common problem.e.g.:Mailing list - openstack@lists.launchpad.net -seehttps://launchpad.net/~openstackto join - searchable archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack@lists.launchpad.net/
@lists.launchpad.net wrote: -To: openstack@lists.launchpad.netFrom: Stefano Maffulli <stef...@openstack.org>Sent by: openstack-bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.netDate: 06/01/2012 12:23PMSubject: Re: [Openstack] search on the mailing listOn 06/01/2012 04:21 AM, Christopher B Ferris wrote: Could
case-insensitive - why would 'Admin' and 'admin' be different? Sure, a role is represented by a string, but why does that string need to be case sensitive?I'd think that if you had distinct roles attributed to 'Admin' and 'admin' that that would lead to confusion.Cheers,Christopher FerrisIBM
+1 Ideally I'd like to see an OpenStack API feature contract of some sort... essentially a document describing the FULL list of features, how those parameters are controlled and how they would interact, and what a project should do if they do not implement an API feature (hopefully only for
+1Over-reliance on WADL will only make it more challenging to gracefully evolve the APIs such that implementations can be forwards and/or backwards compatible, especially when exchanging XML based on an XSD that is not carefully crafted with proper extensibility points incorporated throughout the
Probably not important on a privatecloud deployment, but certainly important in the public cloud space.Actually, I'd say it is equally important in a private cloud context as public. Just because the cloud is behind a firewall does not mean it does not need to be secured as carefully as if it were
+1
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote:
Sounds good to me. Mo working doc builds, mo betta.
Anne Gentle
Content Stacker
a...@openstack.org
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com
wrote:
Hey guys!
We
-openstack-bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote: -
To: andrewbog...@gmail.com andrewbog...@gmail.com, Andrew Bogott
abog...@wikimedia.org, openstack openstack@lists.launchpad.net
From: Joshua Harlow
Sent by: openstack-bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
-1
Gazelle seems to carry more of the characteristics we would want (nimble,
quick). Grizzly carries rather grim connotations
of mauling, lumbering, and having a rather nasty disposition. I would not want
that in a cloud.
Also, as an adjective, grizzly means 'showing characteristics of age,
-openstack-bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote: -
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
From: Monty TaylorÂ
[snip]
So honestly, I'd say the real key is getting us closer to the point
where openstack-common is a proper library, because all of the rest of
the complexity is
John Postlethwait wrote:
... Also, you need to make sure you are linking DIRECTLY to the image
itself, as if it is a redirect or any other HTTP response besides the file,
Glance will still create an image out of it and it will seem to have worked.
Sometimes you can even launch said instances that
+1
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to
run this way? I think the amount of pain / ease that transition is for
users and the OpenStack CI team will greatly
Just to be clear, I was +1 ing Sean's point that we should get sme
experience behind this before pulling the plug.
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to
run this
This level of response is unnecessary.
That said, the perspectives which influenced the decision seemed somewhat
weighted to the development community. I could be wrong, but I did not see much
input from the operations community as to the impact.
Clearly, going forward, we want to be more
+1 to Vish's proposal
I'd go a step further and suggest adopt this model for such changes going
forward.
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 12, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 12, 2012, at 2:36 PM, David Mortman wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:38
This is exactly the sort of interaction we need between the two perspectives of
the OpenStack community.
Thanks
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 12, 2012, at 11:20 PM, Joe Topjian joe.topj...@cybera.ca wrote:
Hello,
I'm not an OpenStack developer nor any type of developer. I am, however,
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 13, 2012, at 12:41 AM, Blake Yeager blake.yea...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
I am excited to see such passion from the community but we need to make
sure that passion is directed in a constructive manner.
+1
Chris___
Mailing
Speaking of the User Committee as proposed in the draft governance docs, I
can
certainly see value in having the committee chair chosen by the board.
However, as
currently proposed, there is a convoluted process for appointing the
representatives
of the committee. Frankly, if you want to give a
Thierry Carrez wrote:[snip] As such IMHO we should leave it as it is.Especially since Launchpad-based MLs don't give us the option tochangethat behavior anyway :)LMAO! TouchéCheers,Christopher FerrisIBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud StandardsMember, IBM Academy of TechnologyIBM
Gabriel Hurley wrote:As a rule of thumb, we need to start doing proper deprecation on allpublic interfaces, whether that's a CLI, client method signatures,APIs, etc. It's a little late for this on the old vs. new glanceclient/CLI (unless Brian feels the work can be reasonably done tomake them
+1Cheers,Christopher FerrisIBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud StandardsMember, IBM Academy of TechnologyIBM Software Group, Standards Strategyemail: chris...@us.ibm.comTwitter: christo4ferrisphone: +1 508 234 2986-openstack-bounces+chrisfer=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote:
Has anyone surveyed those subscribed to openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
list for usage? While imperfect, at least it would be asking the
constituency that might be most affected. You might also consider asking
whether they would prefer JSON or XML, regardless of what they use today.I
23 matches
Mail list logo
