On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:30 AM, thingee thin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Everybody
I'd like to propose Ollie Leahy for cinder core. He has been doing
plenty of reviews and bug fixes, provided useful and tasteful negative
reviews (something often of far higher value than a +1) and has joined
in various design discussions.
I do find Ollie's reviews insightful, but given the current review stats
[0], I'd like to see that more near average with the rest of core.
Besides numbers in reviews I'm mostly looking at bug triaging/fixes and
involvement in the ML and IRC with Cinder.
With that in mind, given the discussions that have been going on and the
direction [1], I'm going to have to give a -1.
I absolutely welcome Ollie to self nominate or be nominated by myself if
that improves after 30 days. [2]
Thanks,
Mike Perez
[0] - http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/cinder-reviewers-30.txt
[1] -
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/012079.html
[2] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
While I think Ollie provides fantastic detailed reviews (and he's a cool
dude), I'd like to see more of them as well. So for now I'm going to have
to vote with a -1.
As Cinder grows I think we need to be taking a closer look at the review
activity by ALL of the core team members.
John
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
