Your family tree lacks any branches, right?
Please, go see a doctor and tell him you have a problem of lack of
attention and care. Which is not going to be fulfilled by me, so stop
trying, kid... gosh
Marcio
---
druid
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Rajko M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 14 May 2007 09:51, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
But sometimes this happens the other way around,
needinfo that never gets answered :-P
It happened and it will happen again if:
- user has no idea that reporting is just a start of process
- user
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 01:25, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Rajko M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 14 May 2007 09:51, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
But sometimes this happens the other way around,
needinfo that never gets answered :-P
It happened and it will happen again if:
- user has
And also:
- needinfo is asking for information that one don't want to publish on
Internet,
This is the #1 non-sense I have read this week, even with all the ms
news going on...
- needinfo is asking for remote access to computer
This is the #2 non-sense I have read this week, even with all
On Tue 15 May 07 21:42, Druid wrote:
This is the #1 non-sense I have read this week, even with all the ms
news going on...
No, you 'tard...that was #1.
This is the #2 non-sense I have read this week, even with all the ms
news going on...
And that one is a tie to #1.
Your family tree
On Sunday 13 May 2007 02:21:13 Felix Miata wrote:
My guess is that those on the SUSE payroll have a portion of their job
performance officially measured by how many bugs assigned to them remain
open and how long they stay open while assigned to them, which would make
it in their own personal
[Sorry for the disturbed threading, don't have the original mail at hand with
proper headers with msg ID etc. to reply to]
On 12 May 2007 10:14:25, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ?
This question, by itself, is perfectly valid. Explanation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-05-14 at 13:51 +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
I still think LATER is better than WONTFIX.
Me too. I think you should drop that WONTFIX from the list of available
options, and use things like can't fix or later. Will not fix
See also
http://en.opensuse.org/Bug_Status_WONTFIX
linked from
http://en.opensuse.org/Bug_Reporting_FAQ#Bug_Status_WONTFIX
CU
--
Stefan Hundhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]Penguin by conviction.
YaST2 Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
On 5/14/07, Carlos E. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Monday 2007-05-14 at 13:51 +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
I still think LATER is better than WONTFIX.
Me too. I think you should drop that WONTFIX from the list of available
options,
First let me explain the WONTFIX situation.
Stefan,
Dont waste your time with it. I know its precious time, cause you get
yast going. It was clear for everybody in that thread in bugzilla the
reason you gave. Some people want to be stubborn and ignore they are
causing problems, namely
On Monday 14 May 2007 14:57:24 Carlos E. R. wrote:
Glad to hear that. Still, some bugs receive no comment for months, a brief
note, even to say, noted, but too busy would be nice and encourage
reporting. For instance, I reported some minor issues that didn't get a
comment. I understand they
On 2007/05/14 14:47 (GMT+0200) Stefan Hundhammer apparently typed:
As for others who raised the question if we get paid by the number of bug
reports we get rid of: No. That would obviously not make any sense, too.
That was me, becomes sometimes the explanations given to rationalize a
On 2007/05/14 14:57 (GMT+0200) Carlos E. R. apparently typed:
The Monday 2007-05-14 at 13:51 +0200, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
I still think LATER is better than WONTFIX.
Me too. I think you should drop that WONTFIX from the list of available
options, and use things like can't fix or
On Monday 14 May 2007 09:51, Duncan Mac-Vicar Prett wrote:
But sometimes this happens the other way around,
needinfo that never gets answered :-P
It happened and it will happen again if:
- user has no idea that reporting is just a start of process
- user just realized that there is no bug and
Geez! I wish all I had to worry about in life were a few icons on my
desktop.
I think someone needs to get a life.
--
(o:]*HUGGLES*[:o)
Billie Walsh
The three best words in the English Language:
I LOVE YOU
Pass them on!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
hi all !
Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ?
They should stop being lazy all the day. That is not a feature-request
but a bug.
The lazy number one is: marcio ferreira and Stefan Hundhammer
link:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=264716
What's worse is that
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
hi all !
Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ?
They should stop being lazy all the day. That is not a feature-request
but a bug.
The lazy number one is: marcio ferreira and Stefan Hundhammer
link:
On 5/12/07, Richard Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide updated/improved icons, so it is easy to patch.
Did you read the bug report ? Look at the gray-background.
The updated icons exist, but are not rendered correctly somehow... (In Yast)
--
-Alexey Eremenko Technologov
--
To unsubscribe,
Op Saturday 12 May 2007 11:14:25 schreef Alexey Eremenko:
What's worse is that they tell me something like: If you do that
again I will formally ask a certain account of bugzilla to be
canceled.
How am I supposed it eat that as a community-member ?
Provide updated/improved icons, so it is
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
hi all !
Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ?
They should stop being lazy all the day. That is not a feature-request
but a bug.
The lazy number one is: marcio ferreira and Stefan Hundhammer
link:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 10:46, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
On 5/12/07, Richard Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide updated/improved icons, so it is easy to patch.
Did you read the bug report ? Look at the gray-background.
The updated icons exist, but are not rendered correctly somehow... (In
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
On 5/12/07, Richard Bos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Provide updated/improved icons, so it is easy to patch.
Did you read the bug report ? Look at the gray-background.
The updated icons exist, but are not rendered correctly somehow... (In
Yast)
Like somebody commented, it
On Saturday 12 May 2007 11:32:42 Marcus Meissner wrote:
What's worse is that they tell me something like: If you do that
again I will formally ask a certain account of bugzilla to be
How am I supposed it eat that as a community-member ?
Stefan has quite a huge number of incoming bugs and
This is not different from the previous bugzilla abuses where
one-closes-bug-other-reopens-countless-times that happened a lot and
usually ends with the bug being set private...
Its an abuse what you did, and I mean exaclty what Ive wrote, that if
you kept re-opening and making people waste
On Saturday 2007-05-12 05:14, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
Why are Novell guys closing perfectly valid bugs as WONTFIX ?
They should stop being lazy all the day. That is not a feature-request
but a bug.
lazy is unfair and exaggerated. Every version of Suse since I started with
8.0 has had
Private message sent to a bug author - mine was a dupe. It was been
partially edited for understandable reasons
Scott OMG its morning 08:08 GMT+10
Quote
With respect to the above bug, I also raised the same issue after I
installed 10.2 when it was first installed by me and my bug was duped as
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Registration Account wrote:
but for what its worth,
just getting this very small, but significant bug fixed has been a huge
effort on your behalf, lest a battle and I thank you for making the
software just a little better.
very small, but significant bug
Background
If anything this bug should just have been changed to an enhancement -
Major reason functionality was not effected. This would have been a far
more productive exercise.
If I log a serious bug and some one closes it wontfix, and after
considering the impact of a fault in functionality I am happy
My guess is that those on the SUSE payroll have a portion of their job
performance officially measured by how many bugs assigned to them remain
open and how long they stay open while assigned to them, which would make it
in their own personal best interest to get rid of them as quickly as
possible
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Registration Account wrote:
The concept of quality in creation and testing of new code they produce
myself is in my opinion - extremely poor,
If you had to restate that into meaningful english, how would you
rephrase it?
In other words: What in the hell did you mean?
Felix Miata wrote:
My guess is that those on the SUSE payroll have a portion of their job
performance officially measured by how many bugs assigned to them remain
open and how long they stay open while assigned to them, which would make it
in their own personal best interest to get rid of them
On Saturday 2007-05-12 20:51, Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
My guess is that those on the SUSE payroll have a portion of their job
performance officially measured by how many bugs assigned to them remain
open and how long they stay open while assigned to them, which would make
it
On Saturday 12 May 2007 19:38, John Andersen wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Registration Account wrote:
The concept of quality in creation and testing of new code they produce
myself is in my opinion - extremely poor,
If you had to restate that into meaningful english, how would you
On Sat 12 May 07 18:58, Registration Account wrote:
Please quit top-posting.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
35 matches
Mail list logo
