Re: [opensuse-ruby] Need help understanding rubygem packaging failures: ruby2.2 is needed by rubygem-...

On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:19:45 +0300 Robert Munteanu robert.munte...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I got an email related to multiple gems which fail building for factory. The root cause seems to be that the build runs with ruby 2.1, but the gem expects 2.2. I am unable to reproduce this in a local

Re: [opensuse-ruby] How to run current versions of ruby on Leap

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 13:38:59 +0200 Henne Vogelsang wrote: > Hey, > > On 27.06.2017 16:13, Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > > What is our stance on this? Are there any pointers? > > Install the packaged version you want. Handle ruby by linking it into > a directory that

Re: [opensuse-ruby] How to run current versions of ruby on Leap

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:01:47 +0200 Cornelius Schumacher <csc...@suse.de> wrote: > On 2017 M06 28, Wed 14:58:33 CEST Marcus Rückert wrote: > > > > as the ruby maintainer i can recommend this way if you can't live > > with versioned binaries. > > The problem wit

Re: [opensuse-ruby] Removing unneeded files from rubygem packages

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:22:02 +0300 Robert Munteanu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Stephan Kulow wrote: > > On 08/29/2017 01:48 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote: > > rubygem-highline has this: > > rm -rf > >

[opensuse-ruby] Dropping ruby 2.2 from DLR(E)?

any objections? 2.3 I just started checking if gitlab-ce works with it now. If it works ... we could drop that as well. I would keep 2.1 until SLE is EOL. If we dont want to delete the packages from DLR. i would at least disable them all for TW. darix -- openSUSE - SUSE Linux is