Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XW-53
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
As a followup to my post... I was able to get WebWork 1.3 to work with a
servlet 2.2 container (Tomcat 3.x). I added the 4 class files found in the
servlet 2.3 jar that WebWork depends on and I switched the view from JSP to
Velocity and it is working just fine. I'll give Sun ONE 6 WebServer a tr
Michael Blake Day wrote:
First of all I have to ask: why won't you store a template in a
relational database?
One word: overkill. Since the database is already a bottleneck in most
applications, I try to relieve the stress as much as possible. Usually
putting templates (which are used on every re
A transactional rdbms is not good for this type of thing for performance
reason. However a lightweight java database engine like jisp should fit in very
well. The key thing here is that the db must support super fast, non
transactional read very well.
--- Michael Blake Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
well even with what I had originally, my expression should invalidate the
data if the string less than 10, if you see what I mean.
the problem actually seems to be that the expression does nothing,
regardless of what the actual expression is. I have tried:
string.length() < 10
string.length() >
The hardest problem with that is that you can't use
context.getRealPath() to get the location of WEB-INF in an unpacked war
config (per servlet spec). Honestly, classpath is usually the best
solution.
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Bogaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June
Guys,
It seems like we are having a lot of problems with finding configuration
files in the classpath etc. Also, I dislike putting configuration files
other than .properties on the classpath. That's why I propose putting it all
(components.xml, xwork.xml etc)under /WEB-INF directly (same as SiteMe
This may have to do, or be similar to
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-186
I think I saw this error on JBoss too.
Hendrik
On dinsdag, jun 10, 2003, at 15:38 Europe/Amsterdam, Andre Mermegas
wrote:
Hrm ok, that's a good quick fix for now, thanks. The IoC stuff seems
> Michael Blake Day wrote:
> > Right, but I've always been against sticking templates into a relational
> > database system, and I've never heard of any other good
> alternative database
> > for document storage.
>
> First of all I have to ask: why won't you store a template in a
> relational datab
Not that my opinion matters much :), but I'm not sure what the
advantages of a database are for files. The performance of a database
for file retrieval is less than that of file system access. You are not
planning to use the database for what it is good for (queries). You
would have to write too
Hi Douglass,
OGNL/XWork/WebWork2 doesn't support this, but we needed this kind of support
in our (Swing) app, so we have patched OGNL to support this kind of "mapped
property". Basically, your tag would look like:
The patch is *very much* a hack but it seems to be working OK for us, and I
can p
Anthony Eden wrote:
Or (as we do) you can simply give Velocity a String with the template.
And of course, String's are easy to store in databases.
I assume you are not allowing the use of #parse or #include since if you
are or plan on allowing it then you will need to use a ResourceLoader.
Early
Michael Blake Day wrote:
Right, but I've always been against sticking templates into a relational
database system, and I've never heard of any other good alternative database
for document storage.
First of all I have to ask: why won't you store a template in a
relational database?
As for altern
Rickard Öberg wrote:
Anthony Eden wrote:
Are you trying to allow modifications of Velocity templates stored in
an unexpanded WAR? There is not an easy way to do this as far as I know.
Well, it shouldn't be *that* hard, but it'd be a hassle when you do
upgrades *shiver*
I think it is ha
An alternate methodology would be to configure within
velocity.properties an additional file location for your templates.
This could then be mapped to a shared network directory on a NetApp file
server or some other similar device.
M
Michael Blake Day wrote:
Right, but I've always been against
Anthony Eden wrote:
Are you trying to allow modifications of Velocity templates stored in an
unexpanded WAR? There is not an easy way to do this as far as I know.
Well, it shouldn't be *that* hard, but it'd be a hassle when you do
upgrades *shiver*
This is not to say it can't be done but
Right, but I've always been against sticking templates into a relational
database system, and I've never heard of any other good alternative database
for document storage.
I suppose that using an unpacked WAR is one solution, but what about the
issue of security? Content people should not have wr
Michael Blake Day wrote:
How do you guys allow customers to modify velocity templates without mucking
with WAR files?
We have portlets which render pieces of pages, and a portlet have a map
(string->object) as configuration. We typically have a "template" entry
which contains the template to be u
Fernando Martins wrote:
I just came to a point that I would really love to start using portlets
all over my Portal. I even find myself coding having in mind how
everything will fit into portlets.
Unfortanetly nothing new on:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-6
Are there a
Are you trying to allow modifications of Velocity templates stored in an
unexpanded WAR? There is not an easy way to do this as far as I know.
This is not to say it can't be done but its probably not worth the
hassle since the interface to files in the Servlet API is geared towards
reading onl
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XW-52
Here is an overview of the issue:
--
How do you guys allow customers to modify velocity templates without mucking
with WAR files?
Blake
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Rickard Öberg
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork]
Hrm ok, that's a good quick fix for now, thanks. The IoC stuff seems
really cool though, not sure if I'd use it, but it'd be nice to have the
option. Hopefully I can track down why ww2/ws5 can't find that
components.xml file and all will be peachy again.
Regards,
-Andre Mermegas
-Original M
See comments inline.
- Original Message -
From: "Miroslav Kes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> I started experimenting with WW some days ago trying to convert a simple
> application in which I originaly used Struts. Now I got to the point
> when I would like to deploy it but found ther
Hi,
I started experimenting with WW some days ago trying to convert a simple
application in which I originaly used Struts. Now I got to the point
when I would like to deploy it but found there was one open question left.
How does the WW access resource bundles for i18n-ized texts?
I looked at
I do not think the methods in BaseActionSupport should be changed to load the locale
earlier. That was only an example of a method depending on the ActionContext. There
might be other occasions when you need the context in a method that You have created.
Keeping a reference to the context will h
It sounds like WebWork can't find the components.xml file. If you don't have
one and don't plan to use the IoC part of XWork, just remove the IoC stuff
from web.xml (the filter and the two listeners).
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Mermegas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
Have you tried string.length() < 10? The validation expression stuff is a
little funky.. sometime I think opposite of what it is (true validates,
false doesn't -- or vice-versa).
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Toby Hede" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09,
Has anyone had any luck running WebWork 1.3 in a container only implementing
the servlet 2.2 spec?
The output from the webwork form fields is being written first in the html
instead of where it should be within the html. Any ideas/solutions?
Situation:
I just finished writing an Intranet applica
29 matches
Mail list logo
