Shouldn't be - it's all in the WebWork module? Just deploy the filter if
you're using WW + SiteMesh, otherwise ignore it. It doesn't actually
interact with SiteMesh, just leave stuff in the request object for SiteMesh
to pick up.
M
On 29/7/03 10:32 AM, "Jason Carreira" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) penned
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Re: WW1.3 and Sitemesh
>
>
> No, the servlet is the dispatcher.
>
> - Before the request, the filter adds a request attr
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:05:57AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> No, the servlet is the dispatcher.
>
> - Before the request, the filter adds a request attribute to say 'I'll
> handle the clean up'.
> - The servlet runs as normal, except if it finds this request attribute, it
> does not pop
> Im also interested in how the ClientDispatcher works?
> Is the ValueStack available on the client side? IE: Can I
> call an action on the server via the ClientDispatcher, and
> access the resultant in a ValueStack on my Swing client? If
> so... COOL And how the hell do you do that???
I have
No, the servlet is the dispatcher.
- Before the request, the filter adds a request attribute to say 'I'll
handle the clean up'.
- The servlet runs as normal, except if it finds this request attribute, it
does not pop the action off the stack, nor clean up the dispatcher.
- After the request, the f
> -Original Message-
> From: Porter, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] examples examples examples...looked
> at xpetstore
>
>
> Im also interested in how the ClientDispatcher works?
> Is the ValueSt
Im also interested in how the ClientDispatcher works?
Is the ValueStack available on the client side? IE: Can I call an action on the server
via the ClientDispatcher, and access the resultant in a ValueStack on my Swing client?
If so... COOL And how the hell do you do that???
Thanks,
Mike
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] examples examples examples...looked
> at xpetstore
>
>
>
> > Yes, that might be valid, but I guess I would at
> > lea
Both the action AND the model are pushed onto the ValueStack. I think
the problem is that for getting params, the value stack goes down the
stack to find the property if it's not in the topmost object on the
stack. For setting properties, it only tries the topmost object, unless
you specify that it
> Yes, that might be valid, but I guess I would at
> least try the
> ClientDispatcher first... I've come to the point
> where I'll work to keep
> EJBs out of projects if possible.
The same is for me... Decent IoC and hibernate for
persistenze does far better job...
BTW, how the ClientDispatche
Hi,
Yes, I realized that too :-) I've changed the code to directly access the variables in
session... thank you all for your help!
Cheers,
James
> -Original Message-
> From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 11:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
James,
It sounds like you don't understand how WebWork works. With each new request
a new Action is created, so you can't do what you're asking. You'd need to
make calls out to the session in order to do this kind of stuff. In short:
Actions are request scoped.
-Pat
- Original Message -
F
John,
Hmm... seems that the action or model should be pushed on the stack, and
then properties could be set at that point. Open a bug about this and we'll
look in to it (there may have been a good reason, but it's way too early for
me to think about it).
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "J
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Why? What are your requirements that necessitate
> > this?
>
> For example - need to access same data model from
> swing application. Or would you favor client
> dispatcher to do this?
>
> regards,
>
What does the filter do in this case? Does it become the whole
dispatcher? I thought you had a heated discussion with someone about why
that was a bad idea :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PR
--- Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Butt, Dudley
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:15 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [OS-webwork] examples examples
> examples...looked at xpetstore
> >
> >
> > Hi,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Butt, Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 6:15 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] examples examples examples...looked at xpetstore
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I really need to know how to get started with trying to put
> it al
On the other hand, webwork has been heavily profiled and optimised, ww2
has not (and I expect a fully optimised release is probably not
something that'll happen soon). Webwork1 is deployed in quite a few
places, webwork2 is only deployed currently by its own developers.
As Mike said, it all
--- Mike Cannon-Brookes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dudley,
>
> I think this depends on your level of comfort.
>
> Personally I wouldn't start a new application with
> WW 1.3 at the moment, as
> your development cycle is likely longer than the
> time until WW2 is released.
> Also using a framew
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mike Cannon-Brookes
> What is wrong with the filter/servlet combination? It works
> perfectly, will
> allow SiteMesh usage with WW tags in the decorator (that's a 'nice'
> combination - no interdependenc
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> James Pan
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 9:55 AM
> What I want to is actually very simple: to allow some kind of
> link with parameters, like
>
> .../mylink?parm1=hello&parm2=world
>
> but to allow for omitting parameters as I see fit... so after
> that call a
Dudley,
I think this depends on your level of comfort.
Personally I wouldn't start a new application with WW 1.3 at the moment, as
your development cycle is likely longer than the time until WW2 is released.
Also using a framework during it's development is the perfect way to get
your bugs fixed
> What I want to is actually very simple: to allow
> some kind of link with parameters, like
>
> .../mylink?parm1=hello&parm2=world
>
> but to allow for omitting parameters as I see fit...
> so after that call above, the data (parm1=hello and
> parm2=world) should be stored somewhere, and then i
I agree - there should be nothing in SiteMesh that affects this.
What is wrong with the filter/servlet combination? It works perfectly, will
allow SiteMesh usage with WW tags in the decorator (that's a 'nice'
combination - no interdependency) and all WW apps will be backward
compatible by just not
Hello,
> Ahh.. If the OgnlUtil does that, it should be logged as a bug. This is
> if the param is not in the params map at all, correct? That would
> definitely be a bug.
>
> >
> > I think he means that the action properties are being set to
> > null by OgnlUtil.copy(map, object)
> >
> > I.e.
Dudley, I can't speak for the core development team, but I suspect 1.3 will
get some attention to fix any major bugs if they are found, but I would
expect (and hope) that most of their attention is focused on WW2.
One of the original goals was stated that WW2 will be backward portable with
WW 1.3
Message:
A new issue has been created in JIRA.
-
View the issue:
http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-237
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
How would you propose this work?
I don't think that this should be put into sitemesh at all - it is a
*webwork* feature, and sitemesh should not have a dependency on sitemesh
at all.
It can easily be done in webwork code, in a way that doesn't affect
anyone who chooses not to use it (apart fro
great thanx for the help, will take a look
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] examples examples examples...looked at
xpetstore
--- "Butt, Dudley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- "Butt, Dudley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really need to know how to get started with trying
> to put it all togethere. I've looked at the
> xpetstore example, but I'm sure one should use a
> session/service EJB layer between Hibernate and WW.
> Has anyone done this yet, I would b
do you guys have a pattern that you always try and use when writing actions
and choosing what alias to use flow?
i've used a few but im curious as to what you guys are using
im thinking of one like this (this is just a simple scenario for example,
editing a users address):
createObject shows the
Hi,
I really need to know how to get started with trying to put it all togethere. I've
looked at the xpetstore example, but I'm sure one should use a
session/service EJB layer between Hibernate and WW. Has anyone done this yet, I would
be most grateful if someone would share some example code t
Hi,
Ok, so once WW2 is up and running, is WW1.3 still going to be supported. I'm just
about to start working with 1.3 using the xpetstore example and I
was wondering if I shouldn't perhaps wait for WW2, or will it be safe to continue in
W1.3 until WW2 is final? Will I be able to port it across e
Updating all the taglibs etc to try to find it using STACK_HEAD as a last
resort sounds a little messy, and is not required by a large percentage of
WW users anyway. The current approach where WW publishes the value so
post-webwork code can access it sounds fine. The real problem of course is
that
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:40:59PM +0200, Anders Engström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a recent thread discussed WW2 and Sitemesh. I've got some
> questions/thoughts on WW1.3 and Sitemesh.
>
[snip]
>
> What was the initial motivation to put the last executed action in the
> request?
>
> After seeing this I
Are there really jsp implementations that use getOutputStream? How
annoying. Would it be better to wrap the response in the dispatcher
servlet? That way the first action could also call getWriter() or
getOutputStream() before forwarding to a jsp. I was also a bit concerned
about the buffering d
Yes. I created an issue yesterday. I sent this email 2 days ago and it has
been floating around inside hotmail until now!
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Carreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:30 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] ActionContext.g
37 matches
Mail list logo
